UDWiki:Administration/Undeletions

Shortcut:
A/U

This page is for the request of page undeletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to undelete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request an undeletion from a system operator. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Please note that Images cannot be restored, they are permanently gone when deleted. If you wish to prevent any currently unused images from being deleted you may wish to Image Ark them.

Guidelines for Undeletion Requests

All Undeletion Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the deletion request in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
• A reason for undeletion. This should be short and to the point.
• A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

Any undeletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Undeletions may only be granted if the user provides a convincing reason as to why the page should be resurrected, or if the page was deleted as a result of a system operators abuse.

Once the undeletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the request will be moved into Recent Actions, along with a comment from the system operator who determined the action take. After a week has passed with the target page in Recent Actions, it can be moved to the Archive.

Undeletion Queue

There are currently no pages in the queue.

Recent Actions

Band of brothers

This page was deleted under the premise that the author didn't want it. I had already checked with the author, and he wanted to keep the page.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Um... un-eaten? 22:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Whoa whoa whoa. I'm keeping this deleted. If a guy wants to keep an empty page alive on the reasoning "he can add more content to it later" then he can recreate it when he has that content. Keeping absolutely empty pages for that reason is pointless. --

 

 

 

 

22:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

How many times have you dumbasses told me you don't delete group pages due to lack of content? -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 22:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Don't be a butthurt tard Poodle, this had no content. Zilch. Not even a space. --

 

 

 

 

22:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Leave it to you to start thinking about some queer shit like that.... -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 22:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, but since you're still firey about an actual crit 1 actually being deleted, I'll give you a quick lesson. See this group? You put it to deletion as a crit 1. It isn't a crit 1, and was kept as such by absolute majority of voters. Crit 1's by definition have to have no content, between either one or two sentences to nothing at all. Band of Brothers was a crit 1 because it had literally no content on it. So it was speedily deleted and only allowed to be put back up once content was put on it. We, by definition of the guidelines, are in the right, and your abrasive and offensive opinion is, quite frankly, wrong. I believe this conversation is practically over, I can't think there could be anything more of value you would have to say here. --

 

 

 

 

22:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Shit is on it so that he can keep the name.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Fine by me. --

 

 

 

 

22:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I just didn't want him losing his group name because his page had no content. Resolution reached.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Speedy_Deletions/Archive/2009_12#Team_Ratfuck.2Ftabhead

Looks to have been blanked and then nominated by a vandal use account that has no business touching the page. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 19:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Hadn't been used since 2008 from what I saw.-- Adward  19:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

And? I can point to half a dozen pages that haven't been used since 2005, can I blank them and then get them deleted? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 19:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

My point is, it didn't have any content then either.-- Adward  19:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Drawde is right; even before the "blanking", the page only consisted of a category. It was a Crit. 1 either way.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 19:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

It's the destination of a fucking redirect if you'd care to go and check, that a group is entitled to have because it's in their namespace. You also seem to be glossing over the potential vandalism you allowed to occur and the pages that have broken redirects on because of your actions. Right there is why the community didn't support you and why you should have never been promoted. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 19:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

We're on a redirect to nowhere...... -- Adward  19:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

It was an empty article, with or without a redirect. Powerchicken 19:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

There we have it.-- Adward  19:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

It was included on other pages in tables, from what I can see. 19:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Undeleted, as you can see (via the groups interesting method of templating a page) that the page was necessary in completing the coding of all their group pages. --

 

 

 

 

00:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)