UDWiki talk:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Midianian|Midianian]] 18:48, 3 August 2009 (BST) | --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]] 18:48, 3 August 2009 (BST) | ||
:I definitely agree with the discussion period. Heaps of people vote in the first day, before ''any'' objections can be raised, and few votes are ever changed. This latest 0x0 image one needs removing and re-starting if it's only supposed to apply to the 0x0 ''revision'', because people voted on it before such issues were even raised, and now others are voting yes on it, in a modified form which is totally different to what the description is <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 22:08 3 August 2009 (BST)</small> | :I definitely agree with the discussion period. Heaps of people vote in the first day, before ''any'' objections can be raised, and few votes are ever changed. This latest 0x0 image one needs removing and re-starting if it's only supposed to apply to the 0x0 ''revision'', because people voted on it before such issues were even raised, and now others are voting yes on it, in a modified form which is totally different to what the description is <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 22:08 3 August 2009 (BST)</small> | ||
:I agree with the discussion period, and the voting thing seems like common sense (especially since scheduled deletions don't need to be taken to a page before being deleted.) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 22:19, 3 August 2009 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 21:19, 3 August 2009
A Couple of Issues
- A lot of the scheduling votes are brought here half baked. I think a mandatory discussion period before voting can begin (like A/PD has) would be beneficial.
- To get a new scheduled deletion, 50% majority is needed. To get a new SD criterion, 66% majority is needed (because it needs to go through A/PD). Seems backwards.
--Midianian 18:48, 3 August 2009 (BST)
- I definitely agree with the discussion period. Heaps of people vote in the first day, before any objections can be raised, and few votes are ever changed. This latest 0x0 image one needs removing and re-starting if it's only supposed to apply to the 0x0 revision, because people voted on it before such issues were even raised, and now others are voting yes on it, in a modified form which is totally different to what the description is -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:08 3 August 2009 (BST)
- I agree with the discussion period, and the voting thing seems like common sense (especially since scheduled deletions don't need to be taken to a page before being deleted.) Linkthewindow Talk 22:19, 3 August 2009 (BST)
