UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/3rd Crat: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I've always been strongly in favour of this decision. There's never really been a case when it's been required before, but I see no harm being done by this. (Crats would have longer terms as a result, but that could be solved by making elections every 3 months rather than every 4 if necessary).--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:10, 30 July 2011 (BST)
I've always been strongly in favour of this decision. There's never really been a case when it's been required before, but I see no harm being done by this. (Crats would have longer terms as a result, but that could be solved by making elections every 3 months rather than every 4 if necessary).--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:10, 30 July 2011 (BST)
:i have no problems maintaining it at 4. --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 22:19, 30 July 2011 (BST)
:i have no problems maintaining it at 4. --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 22:19, 30 July 2011 (BST)
::The only thing I see being a problem with that is that a crat term is then a year long.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:24, 30 July 2011 (BST)

Revision as of 21:24, 30 July 2011

I've always been strongly in favour of this decision. There's never really been a case when it's been required before, but I see no harm being done by this. (Crats would have longer terms as a result, but that could be solved by making elections every 3 months rather than every 4 if necessary).--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:10, 30 July 2011 (BST)

i have no problems maintaining it at 4. --hagnat 22:19, 30 July 2011 (BST)
The only thing I see being a problem with that is that a crat term is then a year long.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:24, 30 July 2011 (BST)