UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Community Sysop Demotion: Difference between revisions
(→Power) |
m (→Power) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Maybe stagger it so that every six months all sysops who have served more than 6 months and aren't bureaucrats go through a reaffirmation of confidence? --{{User:Darth Sensitive/Sig}} 22:36, 18 July 2009 (BST) | :Maybe stagger it so that every six months all sysops who have served more than 6 months and aren't bureaucrats go through a reaffirmation of confidence? --{{User:Darth Sensitive/Sig}} 22:36, 18 July 2009 (BST) | ||
::The problem there might be that we need to vote yes/no on like 7 different sysops in one row.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 22:53, 18 July 2009 (BST) | ::The problem there might be that we need to vote yes/no on like 7 different sysops in one row.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 22:53, 18 July 2009 (BST) | ||
:::The idea of a regular sysop "review" has been shot down too many times before... This is something a little different: it's not an annual report, it's a procedure specifically for recalling/demoting sysops who have lost the | :::The idea of a regular sysop "review" has been shot down too many times before... This is something a little different: it's not an annual report, it's a procedure specifically for recalling/demoting sysops who have lost the trust of the community. Nothing more, nothing less. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 23:02, 18 July 2009 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 18 July 2009
Discuss, ladies and Germs fans. --WanYao 21:34, 18 July 2009 (BST)
Power
The community needs it. I am all for stopping the current system that pretty much grants sysops status for life. It should be possible for the community to force a sysops to get re-evaluated through the A/Promotions system. --Thadeous Oakley 21:58, 18 July 2009 (BST)
The way I see it the actual problem is the very idea that it is a promotion in the first place. It is not, it is a sign that other wiki users think you can be trusted not to abuse additional responsibilities that you have volunteered to take on. Rather than a system for "demotion" I think it would be better for all sysops to face automatic reviews on a schedule not too dissimilar to the Crat elections. --Honestmistake 22:27, 18 July 2009 (BST)
- Maybe stagger it so that every six months all sysops who have served more than 6 months and aren't bureaucrats go through a reaffirmation of confidence? --Darth Sensitive
W! 22:36, 18 July 2009 (BST)
- The problem there might be that we need to vote yes/no on like 7 different sysops in one row.--Thadeous Oakley 22:53, 18 July 2009 (BST)
- The idea of a regular sysop "review" has been shot down too many times before... This is something a little different: it's not an annual report, it's a procedure specifically for recalling/demoting sysops who have lost the trust of the community. Nothing more, nothing less. --WanYao 23:02, 18 July 2009 (BST)
- The problem there might be that we need to vote yes/no on like 7 different sysops in one row.--Thadeous Oakley 22:53, 18 July 2009 (BST)
