User talk:Kirsty cotton

Link Holder

Link for Sandbox User:Kirsty_cotton/sandbox --Kirsty cotton 22:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Link for Sandpit USer:Kirsty_cotton/sandpit

Link for Sandtrap User:Kirsty_cotton/sandtrap

Link for umm...Sandbar User:Kirsty_cotton/sandbar

Link for Template User:Kirsty_cotton/template

The Real Salwy Summers User:Kirsty_cotton/SalwySummers

Sig User:Kirsty_cotton/sig

Pete's Sig User:Kirsty_cotton/sigp

Alts User:Kirsty_cotton/alts

Advert User:Kirsty_cotton/advert

orgxiii8

talk archive, sorta [1]

Kirsty

Chuck

Pete

blackmore scent death http://iamscott.net/1352203362670.html

---

JESUS CHRIST CLEAN UP YOUR TALK PAGE. PUT THOSE FUCKING LINKS IN A TEMPLATE DROP BOX.

Also, if it makes you feel any better, I don't remember Amber Waves having an alt names Ghost Pepper, so it was probably an impersonator altogether. Hagz.--SA 23:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, no idea on that. It was rather short lived anyways. The fuck is a template drop box? --_K 03:42, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Its a thing. A thing like a navbar or sandbox. A place that isn't your talk page and makes it look like your user page.--SA 01:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Signature

As annoying it may be, I'm going to have to ask you to change your signature, as it's currently in breach of the signature policy as extended by precedent applied when Iscariot tried a signature with something similar. Using a lightgray color scheme on a wiki with a predominant white background may seem clever, but really, it's not. I'm not trying to be an ass, it's just an established rule so please try something else, okay?--Thadeous Oakley Talk 11:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

yes you are being an ass. wannabe gay wiki lawyer. where does it say that? and from the poilcy page

What wouldn't be allowed

• Signatures which have images higher than 14 pixels high.
• Signatures which generally break the wiki in some way either through formatting or other means.
• Signatures which impersonate another user.
• Signatures which link to any of the following special pages: Special:Userlogout or Special:BlockIP.
• Signatures which link to external links that perform malicious actions (closing the browser for example).
• Signatures which contain images larger than 50kb.

dickhead.--User:Sexualharrison11:56, 31 December 2012

Goddamn it Thad, when you're doing back seat modding, at least provide a link to the precedent in question. Jesus. --Rosslessness 12:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm not seeing the precedent, Thad. Also, I pretty sure you were indeed trying to be an ass, but perhaps "may seem clever, but really, it's not" is in the official wording of this mystery precedent. Pro-tip: if you think you need to say you aren't being an ass, you are probably being an ass. --_K 17:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

He's talking about this case, as far as I can tell.--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 17:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me that any pretense of a civil discussion on this wiki is still a hopeless affair. Sorry that I dared to request from you to use another kind of signature, one that isn't nearly invisible. Yes, shortround gave the relevant precedent already, so there's that. There also this failed (due a goonrush) policy but one would think it's pretty logical on it's own to have an easily identifiable signature. If you do not feel inclined to change it within the given week, then okay, fine with me, I'll make a case after that and leave it at that. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 18:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Even without the goonsig bumrush the policy would still have failed to pass because it was foolish. By about 5%. You see, where you went wrong was assuming this place was logical. --Rosslessness 00:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Actually chief, you came over to my talk page and made some smart ass comment, while lazily throwing up some bullshit wikilaw as justification. See you in a week. --_K 18:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

which izzy won? so why the self ban?--User:Sexualharrison00:11, 3 January 2013

Izzy didn't win, he was soft warned, his sig changed, and my case ruled not misconduct. That said, it's easier to see K's K than it was to see Izzy's I. But if she gave a shit to be here anymore, I'd politely ask her to make it a darker steely colour.--SA 00:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I wouldn't mind a shade darker, but it even has a little "--" before it, making it even more obvious in case you missed it otherwise. It's not like it's hiding. Iscariot's sig ridiculously hard to see, even more so in his userspace, where his pages were almost all a shade of orange. Kirsty's is not hard to see on most pages. The only issue here is a potential design one, not a wikilaw one. —Aichon— 00:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Also, if you read all the case (particularly Boxy's dicta) then you can see that it's also a very intent based thing and Kirsty isn't trying to screw with people and make it hard to know who's posting.--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 02:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Sadly, I've returned. If you are still interested in this, Thad. Come at me, bro. --_K 23:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

I knew a sexy she-devil like you couldn't stay away forever.--SA 23:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your summary was correct, but I'll work on my tuck method. I'd rather be a sexy she-devil. --_K 01:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Don't we all? :( --SA 17:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

News

The place to go to advertise something like your awards is Community Projects. Wiki News is rather about purely wiki-centered stuff like sys-op bids, crat elections and the like. -- Spiderzed█ 15:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

My awards are taking place completely on the wiki. This is the worst kind of discrimination, the kind against me. Down with the man! ATTICA! ATTICA!--_K 15:13, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Also thanks for posting in community projects. --_K 15:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

In related news, the awards page is now turning into a mess of black-and-white hypnosis wheel as you reach the middle. Mind if I slap some basic formatting on it to make it better readable? -- Spiderzed█ 15:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

That would be fine. I was thinking it might need something. Just make sure there are still some bg tags left. I'd hate to disappoint Whig. Could you add "The Best Murder Awards Since 2011". I was going to do so, but since you actually know what you're doing, it might be better that way. Thanks again! --_K 15:26, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

As a category, or as a page title, or as what? -- Spiderzed█ 16:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

As a page title, seriously, I've got the only one. --_K 16:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)