User talk:Kirsty cotton
Link Holder
Link for Sandbox User:Kirsty_cotton/sandbox --Kirsty cotton 22:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Link for Sandpit USer:Kirsty_cotton/sandpit
Link for Sandtrap User:Kirsty_cotton/sandtrap
Link for Template User:Kirsty_cotton/template
The Real Salwy Summers User:Kirsty_cotton/SalwySummers
Advert User:Kirsty_cotton/advert
orgxiii8 
talk archive, sorta [1]
Kirsty 
Chuck 
Pete 
blackmore scent death http://iamscott.net/1352203362670.html
JESUS CHRIST CLEAN UP YOUR TALK PAGE. PUT THOSE FUCKING LINKS IN A TEMPLATE DROP BOX.
Also, if it makes you feel any better, I don't remember Amber Waves having an alt names Ghost Pepper, so it was probably an impersonator altogether. Hagz.--SA 23:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, no idea on that. It was rather short lived anyways. The fuck is a template drop box? --K 03:42, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Signature
As annoying it may be, I'm going to have to ask you to change your signature, as it's currently in breach of the signature policy as extended by precedent applied when Iscariot tried a signature with something similar. Using a lightgray color scheme on a wiki with a predominant white background may seem clever, but really, it's not. I'm not trying to be an ass, it's just an established rule so please try something else, okay?--Thadeous Oakley Talk 11:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- yes you are being an ass. wannabe gay wiki lawyer. where does it say that? and from the poilcy page
What wouldn't be allowed
- Signatures which have images higher than 14 pixels high.
- Signatures which generally break the wiki in some way either through formatting or other means.
- Signatures which impersonate another user.
- Signatures which link to any of the following special pages: Special:Userlogout or Special:BlockIP.
- Signatures which link to external links that perform malicious actions (closing the browser for example).
- Signatures which contain images larger than 50kb.
dickhead.--User:Sexualharrison11:56, 31 December 2012
Goddamn it Thad, when you're doing back seat modding, at least provide a link to the precedent in question. Jesus. --Rosslessness 12:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing the precedent, Thad. Also, I pretty sure you were indeed trying to be an ass, but perhaps "may seem clever, but really, it's not" is in the official wording of this mystery precedent. Pro-tip: if you think you need to say you aren't being an ass, you are probably being an ass. --K 17:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- He's talking about this case, as far as I can tell.--Shortround }.{ My Contributions 17:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for reminding me that any pretense of a civil discussion on this wiki is still a hopeless affair. Sorry that I dared to request from you to use another kind of signature, one that isn't nearly invisible. Yes, shortround gave the relevant precedent already, so there's that. There also this failed (due a goonrush) policy but one would think it's pretty logical on it's own to have an easily identifiable signature. If you do not feel inclined to change it within the given week, then okay, fine with me, I'll make a case after that and leave it at that. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 18:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
