User talk:Rolfero: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cyberbob240 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::Was not Serious, maybe?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:08, 17 June 2009 (BST) | ::Was not Serious, maybe?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:08, 17 June 2009 (BST) | ||
:::That's a pretty handy straw. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 09:12, 23 June 2009 (BST) | :::That's a pretty handy straw. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 09:12, 23 June 2009 (BST) | ||
::::Who Would be serious about it?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:06, 24 June 2009 (BST) | |||
==Other Messages :D== | ==Other Messages :D== | ||
Moo.[[User:Bananaclasic|Bananaclasic]] 21:46, 9 June 2009 (BST) | Moo.[[User:Bananaclasic|Bananaclasic]] 21:46, 9 June 2009 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 24 June 2009
Rolfero's User Talk
 |
Yes |
| My user talk!
|
Positive Messages
Cookies are appreciated, but not required. :) --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:29, 9 June 2009 (BST)
Thanks for the cookies, Rolf. :) *chomp* *chomp* *chomp*--Zombie Lord 04:32, 10 June 2009 (BST)
I was promised a cookie. Where. TELL NAO. --Haliman - Talk 04:53, 16 June 2009 (BST)
- Of course, of course. check your talk! :D --Rolfero 09:52, 16 June 2009 (BST)
Negative Messages
Template bribery is pretty sleazy.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:58, 12 June 2009 (BST)
- It's just becuase you're not getting a cookie, right? Awww... how cute. --Rolfero 09:52, 16 June 2009 (BST)
- Perhaps it would be more interesting to see if you can get a suggestion through to peer review on its merits alone? Not on giving out templates, which the end user could easily steal or reconstruct themselves.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:52, 16 June 2009 (BST)
- Maybe you're taking rolf's cookies a little too seriously? :) I mean they are good, but I kinda doubt anyone votes just for template cookies...:P--Zombie Lord 20:07, 16 June 2009 (BST)
- Thank you for your comment, Zombie Lord, I we're just about to say the same :D --Rolfero 20:08, 16 June 2009 (BST)
- Maybe you're taking rolf's cookies a little too seriously? :) I mean they are good, but I kinda doubt anyone votes just for template cookies...:P--Zombie Lord 20:07, 16 June 2009 (BST)
- Perhaps it would be more interesting to see if you can get a suggestion through to peer review on its merits alone? Not on giving out templates, which the end user could easily steal or reconstruct themselves.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:52, 16 June 2009 (BST)
I don't know why, but Yonnua just doesn't seem to get much. Even if they were voting for the template, it doesn't matter. Why? Because the way people vote as it is. Quite a few voters vote based on their mood, and not how they actually feel about the suggestion.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:18, 17 June 2009 (BST)
- Yeah... if he doesn't like the "bribes," he can just vote non-keep on his suggestions all the time. Also, urrybody lurves cookies! --Bob Boberton TF / DW 04:29, 17 June 2009 (BST)
- Was not Serious, maybe?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 14:08, 17 June 2009 (BST)
- That's a pretty handy straw. --Cyberbob 09:12, 23 June 2009 (BST)
- Who Would be serious about it?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:06, 24 June 2009 (BST)
- That's a pretty handy straw. --Cyberbob 09:12, 23 June 2009 (BST)
- Was not Serious, maybe?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 14:08, 17 June 2009 (BST)
Other Messages :D
Moo.Bananaclasic 21:46, 9 June 2009 (BST)
