|
This is white so no text is lost. Hopefully.
hai-- SA 00:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Lexicon
I kept the lexicon heading here because you people love to talk to me about it, right? ----RahrahCome join the #party!00:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well deadlines gone, and we're still 4 short, let alone 2 phantoms. We alright adding round 2 phantoms? I assume round 3 starts on monday, as im ready to go.
- You may have to fire up those replacements! --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:38, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hope you don't mind but I did my third week piece. Come on Rory, sort those stragglers!--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Those two people you have listed at the top as not having done their first article haven't been online for a week. Brainguard's last contrib was the 23rd, Adward's was the 27th.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was just tipping you off that you shouldn't be too hopeful of them returning.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
User:Rorybob/advert
Any need for User:Rorybob/advert to be in the recruitment category? -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:16 31 October 2009 (BST)
Promotion Bid
What a massively sensible response to Iscariots comment. Well done sir.--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Reserve Lexicon Place
Okay, thank you for the notification Rory. :)
Jpanzer 21:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
A/VB
At least you're getting involved....
Given that the talk page is going to degenerate fast, and away from the much needed point that needs discussing, I thought it best to reply here. He got 'sardonic replies' etc, because he lied. Look back at contribution history, he states in his edit summary that he's fixing the spelling. He vandalised the page of a group on this wiki and was deliberately deceitful about it. If he'd had followed the directions I gave him and waited for a decision/answered the appropriate questions it would have been sorted. He didn't, even after being told it was vandalism he continued to edit the page of another group for his own personal agenda. He also lied by saying 'tons' of links, in three pages of google there are two, and in between the two UDwiki ones was that comment from the burger site. What do you his chances of getting that removed are? Won't that harm his employment chances just as much? Or do you think his potential employers are going to be more concerned with, you know, things that aren't browser games or indications of sexual acts with meat food products?
SA and I acted like we did because we are under no obligation to be nice to someone who is vandalising, disrupting and lying to this community. --  .  . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Also, reminder, see Giles' talk plz.-- SA 22:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
|
