Suggestion talk:20070623 Better Inventory
Spam / Dupe Votes
1. Dupe/Spam - Spam, because A) not that big a deal B) Firefox already does it. IE sucks so switch. Dupe because there are tons of these that have been put up. One is this, and while they may be different, I'm sure there is one just like yours somewhere..-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 19:48, 23 June 2007 (BST)
2. Spam/dupe - there's plug for firefox that does it, it's not big deal and it was already suggested multible times. and learn how to use templates, have you ever read welcoming i placed on your talk page? --Duke GarlandTLCD SSZ 20:26, 23 June 2007 (BST)
3. Spam/Dupe - Not a big deal; it takes maybe a second of real life time to look for what you need. It is also a Dupe as indicated by Suicidalangel. --Ryiis 23:47, 23 June 2007 (BST)
4. Dupe - I'll believe you when you say this is a dupe, because you lurk here more than me. However, this is not spam. The guy took a time to ponder, he's nont suggesting uber ninja zombies, neither is something completely useless. "IE sucks so change it" is not a good answer either (even tho i agree), because it has nothing to do with the game or the suggestion at all. Just quit being so offensive and spamming everything, specially newbie posts. ~m T! 00:21, 24 June 2007 (BST)
- RE - Guys........ Not everyone has or is willign to download Firefox, and you have to put a link to a suggestion that looks RELATIVLY like mine in order to "Dupe" it. --Bruce Torbaron 02:04, 24 June 2007 (BST)
- Plus, I have Firefox 2.0 and the UD update doesn't work with that. Glenstone 02:29, 24 June 2007 (BST)
- Hmmm, it might be because you use the graphical inventory. I didn't like it, so I turned it off. And on my vote, I had struck out the spam due to reasons stated on his talk page, and the dupe part, I beleive mine still counts because even though it's manual organization, it's still organizing it. And please, in the future, tell me if I'm being an unreasonable asshat on my talk page too.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:01, 24 June 2007 (BST)
- Actually SA, personally I think there is one 'big and important difference between this suggestions and both of the dupe links provided(yours and boxy's). That difference being the stack function, it matters a lot and shouldn't be overlooked.--karek 07:31, 24 June 2007 (BST)
- Stacking has been suggested too. Stack organizing. When you think about it, the actual item type grouping isn't really even needed. It's the stack function that people are yearnin' for, and this one is already PR'd.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 07:43, 24 June 2007 (BST)
- Actually SA, personally I think there is one 'big and important difference between this suggestions and both of the dupe links provided(yours and boxy's). That difference being the stack function, it matters a lot and shouldn't be overlooked.--karek 07:31, 24 June 2007 (BST)
- Hmmm, it might be because you use the graphical inventory. I didn't like it, so I turned it off. And on my vote, I had struck out the spam due to reasons stated on his talk page, and the dupe part, I beleive mine still counts because even though it's manual organization, it's still organizing it. And please, in the future, tell me if I'm being an unreasonable asshat on my talk page too.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:01, 24 June 2007 (BST)
In response to Monstah
Quote: "this is not spam"
The only reason why I voted that this as spam is because Bruce has posted three suggestions within as many days. While I don't think this is necessarily bad, it does show that perhaps he is 'over-eager' more than anything. That being said, I am more than willing to lend any assistance - editing, sounding board, etc - to anyone who would like to come up with a great suggestion. However, it should take time to research and build a draft for a suggestion. Many of the suggestions that come through on this wiki seem to be cooked up in a moment of ephiphany - rather than being seriously thought through. That isn't bad, and I am definately not saying Bruce hasn't thought through his ideas - also, some of the best ideas are thought up in such moments. I am saying though, that these suggestions could be cleaned up a lot and drafted, edited, drafted, and edited again before posting. A polished end product is more likely to be accepted than an 'off-the-top' idea.
I will change my vote to a simple Dupe vote rather than spam, and I encourage Bruce or yourself to contact me on my talk page if either of you ever want to have a second set of eyes to review suggestions before you post them. --Ryiis 21:40, 25 June 2007 (BST)
- Allright, point taken. He did post a lot of them, but hey, at least he's trying. Who is this, anyway? You forgot to sign. SuicidalAngel? ~m T! 01:43, 25 June 2007 (BST)
- Not me, my posts up a section. Besides, last time I tried to change my vote someone changed it back to the way it was before. *Again, stare angrily*-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:54, 25 June 2007 (BST)
- No problem man. After all, my super detective skills figured out who you were anyway.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:48, 25 June 2007 (BST)
