UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Amazing vs Rueful
|
Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log. |
Ruling
Amazing dragged me into this arbitration because I corrected a grammatical error on his user page. http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Amazing&curid=3079&diff=204996&oldid=204164
He has the phrase "Stuff I Supports" which I changed to "Stuff I Support"
While I could care less that he reverted(and called me a "trashbag" for fixing his page), this is more evidence of how Amazing responds poorly to criticism, no matter how true it may be. Why not accept that he had a typo that someone else fixed? Because he's either fully irrational or just trying to stir up drama and get attention.
- Liar, you are mentioned for harassment spanning a very long period of time. -- Amazing 04:02, 21 April 2006 (BST)
WARNING CALLING SOMEONE A LIAR IS AD HOMINEM AND THIS IS ONE OF THE REASONS WE HATE YOU AND NOBODY SUPPORTS ANYTHING YOU SAY STOP MAKING PERSONAL ATTACKS AND START CONTRIBUTING FACTS TO YOUR ARGUMENTS Jesus fucking christ. Rasher 06:37, 23 April 2006 (BST)
Arbiters
- I would be willing to arbitrate, if Both Parties accepts. Conndraka 04:06, 21 April 2006 (BST)
- I would be willing to arbitrate if both parties accept. --LibrarianBrent 04:20, 21 April 2006 (BST)
- I'd accept Conndraka or Brent. Conn's been supportive of me and I guess he'd probably be clear-headed enough, Brent's fair enough that I either come out on his bad or good side depending on the ACTUAL FACTS from my experience. -- Amazing 02:56, 22 April 2006 (BST)
- I accept either, I suppose Conndraka wins since they volunteered first. -- Rueful 19:21, 22 April 2006 (BST)
- Allright. This is how I would like to do it. Both Parties Please E-mail me at jason.bowles AT gmail.com, your specific grievances and any suportive statements. Once I have received those, I will post then those on my Talk page, so that each side may refute or support teh facts as presented by teh other party. Once that is concluded I will review and ask any pertanant questions that may arise in the investigation. Once those questions are awnsered there will be one more chance at rebuttal and thenI will make a decision. Conndraka 19:51, 22 April 2006 (BST)
- Er.. Okay let me contemplate that one for a bit. Are you saying the case itself along with links and etc. should be mailed to you personally? And 'supportive statements' means what, specifically? -- Amazing 01:16, 23 April 2006 (BST)
- To awnser the first question Yes. E-mail me everything. As regard to the second question Grievances are self explanitory, but Supportive statements are just that...Statements of why you feel you are in the right and any context that you feel shouuld be considered. Even first hand accounts can be challanged, so I want to hear the "Why you think you are right" from both parties. Once I have that I can ask questions and get clarifications. Then I can post what I understand the situation to be. IF both parties thaen agree on that aspect, I'll make an impartial ruling in an atempt to solve the issue once and for all.Conndraka 09:06, 23 April 2006 (BST)
- Er.. Okay let me contemplate that one for a bit. Are you saying the case itself along with links and etc. should be mailed to you personally? And 'supportive statements' means what, specifically? -- Amazing 01:16, 23 April 2006 (BST)
- Allright. This is how I would like to do it. Both Parties Please E-mail me at jason.bowles AT gmail.com, your specific grievances and any suportive statements. Once I have received those, I will post then those on my Talk page, so that each side may refute or support teh facts as presented by teh other party. Once that is concluded I will review and ask any pertanant questions that may arise in the investigation. Once those questions are awnsered there will be one more chance at rebuttal and thenI will make a decision. Conndraka 19:51, 22 April 2006 (BST)
Email sent. -- Rueful 05:49, 24 April 2006 (BST)
- Conndraka: do you have everything you need? I hope I didn't flood you with too much evidence, but I'd like to know what happens next. Cheerio! -- Rueful 19:36, 26 April 2006 (BST)
- Yes (From You) I Still need (Hint Hint if you are reading this)Amazing to E-mail me his side of the issue. Since I failed to include a time requirement he has until the MAY 10 Deadline set by Oddstarter for resolution. I will render a statement as soon as I receive his e-mail. Conndraka 21:21, 26 April 2006 (BST)
- Though I shouldn't have to e-mail you, I've agreed to. You'll recieve it by the 10th. -- Amazing 04:50, 27 April 2006 (BST)
- Yes (From You) I Still need (Hint Hint if you are reading this)Amazing to E-mail me his side of the issue. Since I failed to include a time requirement he has until the MAY 10 Deadline set by Oddstarter for resolution. I will render a statement as soon as I receive his e-mail. Conndraka 21:21, 26 April 2006 (BST)
Final Ruling:
Having viewed evedence both on and off the Wiki, I beleive that the situation can be solved with a heavy dose of STFU. Therefore:
1. Amazing is not to Comment on any page where Rueful can be considered an invested party (i.e. Rueful's User page, or any group of which Rueful maintains an active membership in wether he has posted recently on that page or not).
2. Rueful is not to comment on any page where Amazing is considered an invested party(i.e. Amazing's User page, or any group of which Amazing maintains an active membership in wether he has posted recently on that page or not).
3. Neiter Amazing nor Ruful are to comment directly to or about each other on any page that is considered "Community Property" such as discussion pages or sugestion pages.
4. Templates, or Pages (Other than personal talk pages)created by either party that exists (or may be perceived by a mod) as existing exclusivly to antagonize the other party shall not be created by either party.
5. Failure to Comply will be considered vandalism, and is to be reported to a Mod for removal.
So Ruled in Arbitration Conndrakamod T W! 00:01, 11 May 2006 (BST)
