UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Fuster vs Gage

Fuster v Gage

Reference for clarification of 'Spam' votes and 'Spaminated' deletions on suggestions page

I am concerned that there is a confusion over the application of spam votes on the Suggestions page, which leads to premature removal of any suggestion which might generate spam in-game rather than which is spam on the Suggestions page itself. See this on Gage's talk page, which relates to this suggestion deletion. - Fuster 03:38, 19 September 2006 (BST)

This is arbitration dude. That kind of issue belongs maybe to "policy discussion" if you want a change, or something else. But here is for "party vs party" issues. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 03:32, 19 September 2006 (BST)

Then allow me to aim the complaint more squarely at Gage's conduct in making the deletion and refusing to reconsider it. Not only is the Spam voting misapplied but several of those votes provide no reason and are therefore not valid. - Fuster 03:58, 19 September 2006 (BST)

This is not the appropriate venue for your complaints: invalid votes are struck, and there is no definition of a correct "application" of a spam vote. Case overturned. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 04:11, 19 September 2006 (BST)

For the record - I totally reject the moving of this complaint to archives and have tried to reinstate it to the arbitration page once already. At no stage have I approved an arbitrator. At no stage has the substance of the complaint been considered. I am left feeling that Gage in particular is a cunt and that the wiki is dominated by idiots. The misuse of spam votes on the suggestions page continues and I am forced to conclude that the only way to demonstrate this is to add my own votes to spam on every suggestion there, demonstrating the negative effect this has. -Fuster 00:43, 28 September 2006 (BST)