UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Misanthropy/2012-12-24 Promotion

Administration » Sysop Archives » Misanthropy » 2012-12-24 Promotion

This page is an archive of Misanthropy's Promotions candidacy, which was unsuccessful. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page.

Misanthropy

Fuck you guys. There's not enough misconduct around here. Give me danger buttons again. It'll be fun. 20:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

• I don't always contribute to bandwagons, but when I do, I always vouch for Misanthropy. ~ _{20:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC)}
• Question - On who will be the last laugh in all that fun? -- Spiderzed█ 20:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  Society. Or Axe Hack, iunno. Forethought is not a strong suit. 21:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  Follow-Up Question - What is your strongest suit? Spades, Hearts, Diamonds or Clubs? -- Spiderzed█ 21:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  Cups. 21:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  Yet Another Follow-Up Question - What is your stance on 2Girls1Cup? -- Spiderzed█ 21:40, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  Legs akimbo, cock in hand. 03:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

• Question: Should I add {{bid}} to your candidacy? Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 20:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  I am not an auction, sir. 21:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  I've never worked with you closely, but you seem to have been an excellent sysop in the past and I love your attitude. Vouch Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 01:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

• Vouch Maybe he'll be a cause for drama giving me a reason to backseat mod once again. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 21:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  In all seriousness, if you really want it, then go for it, I guess it would live the place up a bit. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 21:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

• vouch hates all the same people I do. include me in that list.--User:Sexualharrison22:51, 24 December 2012
• Vouch - Oh god yes, vouch. We had some quick rough patches but I've always respected you Mis, and your excellent attitude to... well, most things. Keep on truckin' A ZOMBIE ANT 23:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

  Now I've sobered up I'll quickly say that whether the bid is serious or not, it would never take me long to recommend Misanthropy. You're a good dude, good op. A ZOMBIE ANT 09:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

• Pudding? --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 14:22, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
• Vouch You had me at "fuck you guys." --_K 15:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
• You and me all the way, sugar tits. You and me. Lets do this. I need someone to back me up in my sprucing up of this place.--SA 10:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
• Vouch →Son of Sin← 19:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
• Questions 1: Would you consider working on the game outline from your profile as a serious project? 2: what's your stance on making the suburban maps up to date?Parson Johanas 18:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

  1) Doubtful. Mr. Easton Ellis seems like the type to sue. 2) My only real bugbear with suburb maps is how they're so harman-friendly. The idea that "safe" and "dangerous" apply only one way is egregiously biased; to that end I did come up with an alternate colour scheme to sit alongside the current one but it was refused by the breathers. Frankly, aside from NPOV issues I think the level of information being kept up to date should be left as is; using information as a tool or a weapon has long been an interesting facet of play here and I'd be loathe to see an initiative started which might hamper that. Oh shit I'm starting to sound serious here FUCK YEAH I LOVE BOOBIES. 21:08, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

  Vouch I had an ulterior motive with the questions: to see if you can be serious when called for, you can, ergo, you have my support. Parson Johanas 23:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

• Just spent ten minutes trying to guess my password for this vouch. Linkthewindow  Talk  16:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
• Meh -- boxy 15:11, 3 January 2013 (BST)
• fuck yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 10:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
• can i has vounch --hagnat 23:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
• Vouch. This guy seems trustworthy. 19:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

While it's true that there's no such thing as too much Mis, there is such a thing as too little, and we feel that that's what we've been seeing recently. So, despite the fact that we might (generally) trust him with the buttons, we'd like to see a bit more activity before making them available, lest his idle hands put them to "dangerous" use. As such, I'm afraid that we will not be promoting Mis at this time. —Aichon— 20:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Misanthropy (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.