UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Amazing vs Banana Bear4

More Hagnat Please

Zing, I was wondering if you would change your mind about Hagnat not being objective for this one case, as he already ruled on it, and ruled in your favor. I mean, if you want to sit it out and just wait for Brent, thats on you, but it seemed to me that Hagnat was decent on this issue before it got dragged back out of the grave. -Banana Bear4 11:03, 25 April 2006 (BST)

Our first Ruling

I was reading Amazing's talk page, looking through the History. Now, let us make this clear. The drama llama thing states that the user will delete trolling from its own talk page, but it doesnt give him the rights to flame those whom messages were deleted. Amazing was an ass by removing all your edits on his talk page, and placing annoying comments about how you would end up in the vandal report page and how you and scinfaxi were dating (or something on these lines). These clearly annoys anyone, and any one in your situation would end up adding further edits to his page. Now, amazing can be blamed here, but you are not 'clean' on this. Soon as amazing first removed your messages your should have realized your messages werent welcome, even those who were only mild funny (nothing related to amazing). For that, i think you must get a first warning, as to not mess in talk pages from user you are clearly not welcome. This goes to all others who posted on amazing talk page after he removed and/or edited their lines. --hagnat t • mod 20:48, 19 April 2006 (BST)