UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Amazing vs Banana Bear4

Ruling

	Gold in the Basket Supporter
	This user or group believes that if Amazing does in fact put the gold in the basket that this situation can be resolved.

I'm back! Flipping sweet! This isn't ridiculous at all! I will now lodge an arbitration against the arbitration page for harassing me, Aha! -Banana Bear4 22:11, 19 April 2006 (BST)

I will volunteer to arbitrate this Arbitration, agains arbitration. Since the arbitration page is a non-sentient entity, and therefore cannot consent to my arbitratorish tendencies, you consent/evidence of said harrasment/ridicule/flippingness are undisputed fact, and therefore I rule in your favor--Bermudez 22:56, 19 April 2006 (BST)

Witness the gang of aggitators as they very obviously attempt to destroy all proceedings brought forth be me. It's too bad that this kind of flippant disregard for this case is allowed, if not encouraged. -- Amazing 03:12, 20 April 2006 (BST)

You silly goose, its that Hagnat ruled on my part of the case up higher on the page, and said I could go and now its dragging me back. If that is not cause for me to feel harassed by the page's trickery, nothing is. Stop trolling me! Haha! Unsubstantiable claims! -Banana Bear4 18:05, 20 April 2006 (BST)

Also there was this interesting decision on talk page control that Brent made a little while ago. I thought it was a rather interesting perspective so thought I'd give you all a link.

Arbiters

Hagnat already sorted my part out I thought.. Hagnat, General, they'd be good but probably aren't the only acceptable arbitrator choices. I think my part of the case is pretty simple. Whatever, don't stress over me you lot, this is all a mess. -Banana Bear4 18:10, 20 April 2006 (BST)

Yes. Your case seems to be already settled. A warning and a 'stay-away-from-amazing-talk-page' cookie. Unless amazing has anything else to add against you. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 18:31, 20 April 2006 (BST)

These cases are all pretty ludicrous. I still say I didn't need that warning, but the arbitrator team has enough on their plate. Good luck. -Banana Bear4 00:46, 21 April 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate if both parties accept. --LibrarianBrent 04:20, 21 April 2006 (BST)

If there's still a case against me, I accept you just the way you are. Hagnat may have ruled on it higher up the page but I don't know for sure..-Banana Bear4 10:15, 21 April 2006 (BST)

I'd either accept the "stay away from Amazing" or Brent as fresh eyes on the case. Whichever works. "Stay away from me and stop calling me names every five seconds" was pretty much one acceptable outcome to me. -- Amazing 03:04, 22 April 2006 (BST)

For the record, I am fairly certain the edits to your talk page where both, more than five minutes apart, and not containing any name calling, other than a claim that Scinfaxi was making you look dumb. After that, mostly I asked for clarification as to what was bothering you about me serving as his proxy, and saying I disagreed with some of your more wild accusations. Here are the only two links left in Amazings history.

[Exhibit A]

[Exhibit Rock'n'Roll]

Also, remember how our conversation that night started? I quoted Scinfaxi, and you replied by deleting my comment and replacing with something like "Scinfaxi and Bananabear kissing on the porch again," with similar knee jerk deletions and insults following. I don't mean to say you can't way what you please on your talk page, but I am saying that if you wanted me to stop calling you names every five minutes, you created a nice paper tigerbananabear to call arbitration on. -Banana Bear4 16:57, 22 April 2006 (BST)

It's funny how you think that repeatedly editing my personal space with the offensive comment of someone else whose text I already deleted somehow does not make you a vandal troll. -- Amazing 18:27, 22 April 2006 (BST)

¯\(o_º)/¯ -Banana Bear4 18:34, 22 April 2006 (BST)

Agreed. -- Amazing 19:06, 22 April 2006 (BST)

• We reached an agreement, good. Case closed. Blue ribbons all around.-Banana Bear4 23:48, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Sorry, that's not how it works. Nice try though, and thanks yet again for showing your true colors. -- Amazing 03:19, 24 April 2006 (BST)

• No problem, I'm glad you also find my true color to the blue of divine purity. Also, I thought that arbitration was just a way for two people to come to an agreement on something, and your statement above clearly reads "agreed" - Banana Blue4 03:39, 24 April 2006 (BST)

If there still is a need for an arbitrator, I'll volunteer.--Vista ^W! 18:39, 25 April 2006 (BST)

• There really is no need, as Hagnat ruled on it and dismissed me before we called it Wikigate, but when the case got split up, I got brought back in, so if this means someone aint done with me yet, I'm cool with you taking care of this. -Banana Bear4 19:21, 25 April 2006 (BST)

Hagnat resolved this case by warning Banana Bear4. Also, if you still insist on reopening this case then I am prepared to be the arbitrator.--The General ^{W! Mod} 19:39, 25 April 2006 (BST)

• I don't think this needs to be opened again, but if Zing wants it, I'm cool with you doing it. If it is resolved, can someone move it to the right section of the Wikigate thing? -Banana Bear4 23:05, 25 April 2006 (BST)

• Sorry, that it was a bad choice of words, what I meant to say was that if Amazing still wants to reopen this case then I am prepared to arbitrate. Sorry if it looked like I was attacking you.--The General ^{W! Mod} 19:17, 26 April 2006 (BST)

• No worries old chum I get your meaning, also ¯\(o_º)/¯ -Banana Bear4 20:32, 26 April 2006 (BST)

So what's going on with this case? --V2Blast 21:41, 8 May 2006 (BST)

I think it needs to be moved to resolved cases, however, I think it would be poor etiquette to move it myself, as others may have more to say.-Banana¯\(o_º)/¯Bear 21:54, 8 May 2006 (BST)