UDWiki talk:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2009 02

UDWiki:Administration/Speedy_Deletions/Archive/2009_02#Beatbox_Kids.2Frecruit

Does another sysop want to override Nubis, or are we going to misconduct?

Policy gives Nick complete control over that page as group leader, the entire fucking archive is full of user and group pages deleted after request by the designated owner. This is a new level of petty from Nubis. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 02:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Let's look at a few things like intelligent people for a moment, Iscariot. (pretend ok?)

• It's a group page. We don't delete defunct group pages. The group just went inactive.
• (ignoring point one) The history on the page only shows Grim as editing. It does not show that anyone else touched it since 07.
• The Beatbox Kids doesn't list Nallan as the leader. Leadership: None
• The link you provided doesn't help your case. It clearly says that the group LEADER has control over the group PAGE (singular). If you want to split hairs (as you so often do) then Nallan isn't listed as the leader and the text says group page (meaning the main one under the name space. It does not specify other pages).

But please, run to another sysop and have them do what you want. I am sure that you have many supporters among them. --– Nubis ^NWO 03:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Let's go through yours in turn:

1. It's a sub page, not a group page, the actual group page is not up for deletion and lists them as inactive.
2. See 3
3. If you'd actually taken the time to look at the page that's up for deletion, you'd see this: "The Beatbox Kids are a survivor only group founded by their leader Nallan and named by their token white guy Omegabeetron." Now you say no-one's touched it since Grim in 2007, I'd call that a cast-iron case that he can be considered the leader and that it hasn't been recently changed to allow him to delete another group's pages.
4. See 3

Q.E.D. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Basically what he's saying is there's no real particular reason to do it although there's nothing specifically barring serving it either. If more of them feel the same about the subpage than it'll end up deleted. --Karek^maps?! 03:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I guess I could take it to deletions... right?--Nallan (Talk) 07:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Ahh i love this. Nubis if Cheese or whoever wanted some bullshit like this deleted you'd do it. The thing is it's not like anyone gives a fuck, I'd say Iscariot calling you petty is the pot calling the kettle black, but this really is really fucking petty...--xoxo 08:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)