UDWiki talk:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2009-03-14 Promotion

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

DanceDanceRevolution talk

  • Vouch - By going on a long hiatus, it really shows me that this user wanted to separate the old him, from the new him. Admittedly, when I used to lurk around a but, DanceDanceRevolution used to be very active at the same time as me. Most of the time he was constructive and I both enjoyed and respected his opinion. He gave off the aura as someone who knew what they were doing, and I think that is very important to new users in particular. If there were more people like him around, I would have joined a lot earlier, and not been so put off by the constant drama and power struggles. I did see him get caught up in some drama with other users, but he was only ever secondary, and most of the time I took it as some tongue in cheek humour. Overall, I think that by coming back with a bang, DanceDanceRevolution is showing the community that he wants to be here, and he wants to be ridden of his past dramas. An extended hiatus is always a good opportunity to better yourself, and reflect on how you can better serve the community. Is that good enough Nubis? haha.--DiscoInferno 14:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Who the fuck are you?--ScouterTX 14:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Haha and I didn't believe you were a goon. *so proud*
@Disco - It's not better because you actually vouched for him.--– Nubis NWO 01:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I just looked at your page. I really don't feel the need to comment much further now haha. 'Tard.--DiscoInferno 14:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Wait, so you're saying that inactivity was actually a positive thing? Lol. If I ever want to be sysop again I'll know what to do; simply take a break for a month or two, come back, go on a spree of "good" edits then submit a bid. It can't fail. --Cyberbob 14:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • You are predictable, but I'll bite. No I'm not saying inactivity is good, I am saying that this user obviously knew he was heading down a bad path and did the only thing he could do to rid himself of it. I am vouching him because I think he would be a good sysop, not because he went on a hiatus. The fact that he came back shows me that he really wants to be here.--DiscoInferno 14:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Do you in fact know why he left? What if it wasn't to embark on some mystical journey of enlightenment but he simply was too busy IRL, or was butthurt about something that happened that he didn't like or any one of a million reasons (most of which far more probable too) than the one you name? I think you're playing armchair psychologist and I think you're dead wrong. --Cyberbob 14:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Judging by the way you carry on around me Bob, it doesn't look like I'm the one who is butthurt. Still, after all this time. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • What I want to know is, why the fuck does Cyberbob feel the need to make comments on everybodies vouches or againsts or abstains? He has already had his one opinion, and thats all he is worth on this page. If you disagree with someones opinion, then bad luck, its the Bureaucrats job to take opinions into account, not a regular users. Unless you are in some sort of important position, then why is your opinion more valid than somebody elses?--DiscoInferno 07:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Why do you hate freedom? --Cyberbob 07:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • It's a discussion. All this discussion helps the bureaucrats make up there mind. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • omigod how dare you make a comment outside of ur vote ur such a fucking troll --Cyberbob 07:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • First, I never said it was a vote, if you bothered to be anything other than a fool you would realize that out of the 30 odd posts I have made, half of them are on this page, and half of those were explaining my loathing for people considering this a vote. On to your post, I hate freedom? You are the one that feels it necessary to make a comment on every post that you disagree with, oblivious to the fact that nobody takes a thing you say seriously, whether it is good or bad. I vouched, you could call that a freedom of mine, and you decided to attack me for it. Get the over your little piss fights with people, it looks as if it has been months. Grow up, and stop acting like a child. Also, if you meant to put a comma after the "Why", then no, I do not hate freedom, I just hate idiots who chime in like their opinion has any massive effect on this whole process anyway. You voted against, because you are have an incapability to rise above pettiness. We know that, so no more need to post. I'll be doing the same, regardless of what butthurt statement appears below this within the next 2.3 seconds.--DiscoInferno 07:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • YOUR RESISTANCE ONLY MAKES MY PENIS HARDER (9/10 would troll again) --Cyberbob 07:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Wait, bob, I'm confused. Am I supposed to defend him this time? We seem to have switched roles here. --– Nubis NWO 01:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Vouch Good enough for me. While you can still be a little abrasive that doesn't stop Nubis doing a decent job and I have noticed a lot of very constructive work from you recently. The fact that it will piss bob off is really just icing on the cake.--Honestmistake 08:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • nice bad faith vote I'm sure the crats will definitely take it into account --Cyberbob 08:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Nothing bad faith about my vote vouch. I weighed up the pro's and cons of the candidate and liked how he answered... the fact that it pisses you off is, as I say, a bonus!--Honestmistake 11:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • if you think I take you seriously enough to be pissed off that you're vouching for someone I'm against... lolnarcissism (you truly are nothing but an excellently easy troll target; your penchant for xbox hueg rants makes you juicy indeed) --Cyberbob 12:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I no longer care what you think Bob, why do you think i let you have the last word so often? Frankly you are a slightly amusing little troll and its funny to reflect that you really do think you are smarter than everyone here when the reality is that you are just a pathetic, bile filled little boy who still hasn't gotten over how "KEWL" it is to be rude on the internet--Honestmistake 13:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I'd rather be a "little boy" on the internet than a 30-year-old kthxbai (also way to disprove your own comment about not caring what I think by going to such lengths to try and shout me down) --Cyberbob 13:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  • You're just as narcissistic. There are other people who read this wiki, yet you assume he does it all just for you. Now, could you two please stop spamming this page with irrelevant crap? --Midianian¦T¦DS¦SP¦ 14:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
eh what? who does what all just for me? plz to be more clear tia --Cyberbob 02:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • please leave this space blank for bob's tiresome last word--Honestmistake 13:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki_talk:Administration/Sysop_Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2009-03-14_Promotion&oldid=2089081"