User talk:Burgan/BuildingDist

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Holy crap do you have free time. --Joe O'Wood TALKCONTRIBSUD 23:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Have you thought about organizing this a little better? Maybe putting the 'burbs in alphabetical order in a table that isn't one column, so it is easier for people to use? Maybe making charts for comparison? Or organizing the data so it is also in rows and columns, not one giant page of a single column.

Thanks, --Vikermac 03:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, I was comparing some of these figures with real life numbers. Malton has 250 hospitals, and in reality the UK as a whole has 500. If Malton were real, it would have to be very big, or very unhealthy. --Toejam 21:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

This would have saved me a LOT of time back in May... Thanks.--Labine50 MH|ME|'07 03:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your suggestion, I just just thought it'd be worth pointing out that you have Cathedrals listed in the "Heavily Barricaded" section while Mansions are in the "Extremely Heavily Barricaded" section - I feel that the game might be more realistically served by having it reversed. The distribution seems to be equal for the two building types.

Cathedrals - Stone, Heavy Glass windows with wire meshing (often times too high up or thin to enter), Large heavy doors.

Mansions - Typically wood, large windows designed for providing a good view out (or in), entry ways tend to be open and designed to provide a good view, front doors may be excessive but side doors tend to be normal size/weight.

I figure it's a wash in regards to couches and pews between the two types for blocking material. A Mansion would potentially have more small rooms to block - a Cathedral being mostly open space, but I think the building as a whole would required way more doors and windows to be blocked then a Cathedral would.

That said, it's probably too late for you to change your suggestion anyway. I just figured I'd put my two cents in. I had been reading through and I quite enjoyed yours, but I found that one part odd. Thanks! --Anselan 07:00, 19 July 2007 (BST)