User talk:Nalikill/Gun Vote

Now if you change it, its vandalism of my user subpage.

Man, come up with your own arguments, this lacks any semblance of class.--Karek^maps?! 06:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

If you can come up with a more elegant argument against new guns, I'd be happy to hear it.  Nalikill  ^{TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI}  06:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I have dozens. I already called dibs on the one im using because its much more effective against trenchcoaters than the others. Try commenting on something else rather than trying to usurp mine, or better yet, just drop this whole thing. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 06:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I once cared to, it was easy to come up with them and I would like to think there was elegance in it. However I generally don't like the idea of large cookie cutter texts for votes that most people will probably ignore. If it's already known one user is always going to use that argument or a similar one there is no reason to vote with that argument, simply say As Grim then wait for him to vote or something. Doing it this way adds nothing to the system and adds quite a bit of side drama because every time you do actually use said vote it can only serve the purpose of pissing off the user who always uses that vote and who came up with that argument. But as for new guns, really, just bring in how having a new one will screw their search rates and in less text you've made a point that will get the people who like using guns voting against guns. P.S. I think you misused the term exponentially, it needs the use of an exponent in the equation for something in it to increase/decrease exponentially.--Karek^maps?! 13:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)