User talk:Nervie
Cheers Nervie for putting it up on the talk page, that way we won't get silly reverts. Just because Ridleybank is controlled by the RRF doesn't mean that the Ridleybank page is allowed to be POV like the group's page. --Daxx 14:35, 14 Dec 2005 (GMT)
- Hey, I wrote most of the RRF's page!
- But, yeah, I agree with you, a lot of our guys have a tendancy to get ... overzealous and add silly comments to the end, as have other groups, like the RLA. I like clean, unbiased wiki pages when possible, so I keep an eye on it, as do some others, such as User:DarkLight140 - Nervie 14:41, 14 Dec 2005 (GMT)
Defeat only says that a group lost in the particular event specified (In the case we are arguing over, this would be the Defeat of the gingerbread man AT the warehouse). If you are going to remove defeat from the text of the ridleybank page, i ask you to remove any mentioned defeat in the wiki. Fair is fair. --Grim s 06:28, 15 Dec 2005 (GMT)
- The difference is, we (the rrf) were defeated at Caiger. We lost, we left, that was it, no more Caiger Siege for the RRF.
- If the Gingerbread slaughter of December 9th turns out to be their own defeat, i.e they bugger off and leave Ridleybank for the Ridleys, then we can go back and call it a defeat. And if not, well, the next time we kick thier asses we can talk about it then again. And for the record, I was not referring to you when I talked about some of the Ridleys getting overexcited on the wiki pages, and getting thier BARHAH all over it. Nervie 07:07, 15 Dec 2005 (GMT)
reverts and RRF edits 11th Feb '06
I don't appreciate your reverting of my ridleybank edit just because it mentions zombie spies. I have first-hand seen humans with RRF groups in strongholds that were subsequently invaded by zombies, have seen at least one instance of graffiti sprayed on the outside of a building labelling it empty (with the markings "your friendly neighborhood zombie spy" or something), and of course the uncanny way that the zombies keep finding the leader of the GBM within hours of his revive. Personally I don't care whether spies are in use; all's fair in love and war after all. I've dropped mention of spies, but clearly it's anything but nonsense, and I think you have been unfair to revert the entire edit. - BryceHarrington 09:06, 11 Feb 2006
- Firstly, I reverted the entire edit to allow you to rewrite your contribution, as I thought it was well written, bar the "zombie spies" bit.
- Secondly, the RRF does not use zombie spies, it's as simple as that.
- If a revived RRF member turns up in your safehouse, you can be sure that means RRF are in your area, and if the RRF are in your area, every secured building is an open target - you don't need zombie spies when you're sacking a whole suburb. I have to ask you to trust us on this, I know these people, and I know how we plan our shit, and believe me, there is no spying or alt abuse allowed. I wouldn't put any stock in any tagging you saw inside RB, the RRF cannot bar players from entering Ridleybank - but the ultimate proof is in this : Create a survivor character, put "zombie spy" or "Zombies: please don't kill me, I'm on your side!" in the profile, leave them outdoors in Ridleybank - and see how long they last.
- Thirdly, we have not been as succesfull in hunting the gngabrahs as you might think, even the strike teams, which are well-oiled, undefeated death machines have been forced to crack 2-5 buildings per raid before they can find a single GBM - if the GMB have been taking high profile casulaties it is not because of "ZOMBIE SPIES" but because the GBM have gravely underestimated the amount of damage the RRF can cause. Nervie 12:16, 11 Feb 2006 (GMT)
Several of your members are getting overly zealous on the Barrville page and are refusing any viewpoints that don't lavish praise on the RRF. I don't know if you have any sway in your faction, but could you perhaps look over the history and see if this is being blown out of proportion or not? I do appreciate anything you can do. Please don't hesitate to contact me on my discussion page if you have any questions. --Torvus 06:40, 25 February 2006 (GMT)
I appreciate your response and we're attempting to work towards a resolution that is amicable for both sides. One idea being tossed around is to have only one MFD and one RRF member editing the Barrville page. Hopefully this pans out and we can move forward with playing the game instead of bickering over a wiki page. Thanks again for your time. --Torvus 21:40, 25 February 2006 (GMT)
RRF Leader
"Screw leadership. But we listen to Petrosjko, sometimes." Petro told me it was okay to change the Leadership entry back to that. Jorm reverted it and pointed out the you're in charge of the page. Do you mind if that gets put back? --SirensT RR 01:59, 30 April 2006 (BST)
- To be honest, I think it's a little daft, but if Petro's says it's good, then go for it.Nervie 16:21, 30 April 2006 (BST)
