User talk:Punchkin

On the evidence against page you indicated that trolling like this was counterproductive, yet there is solid evidence that amazing vandalised that page. Check the history before my revert--Mpaturet 08:05, 24 April 2006 (BST)

Mrh Cows

Why did you remove that paragraph? --Sirens^{T RR} 03:13, 4 May 2006 (BST)

the arbitration page.

I think it's readable as an official-looking warning of "if this user has offended you, you may be punished for retaliating". Which is weak, I just think fake system messages should be more of a concern than "Amazing is watching" if we're discussing what should and shouldn't be allowed. --Punchkin 17:33, 31 May 2006 (BST)

I have severe difficulties reading that into it myself. It looks like no other system message I've ever encountered both in form and in style. The very unclear wording should make even the most confused newbie think twice, certianly with all the antagonizing conversations on his page. The reason why I didn't say anything about the text itself is because it is almost impossible to regulate content in a way you propose. By limiting the technical possibilaties it's very unlikely to fool people in the way you're afraid of. --Vista 11:56, 1 June 2006 (BST)