User talk:RevivePointUpdate/Reganbank

I will unlink this template (or whatever its fucking called) from the Reganbank Page and replace it with a generic "revive points at Cemetaries". This is because of no updates in years, and the two forums links no longer work.-- LABIA on the INTERNET ^{Dunell Hills Corpseman} #24 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 09:08, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

I went ahead and updated it to remove the things you mentioned that were outdated. Your call if you want to keep it or not. No skin off my nose either way. —Aichon— 19:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Sounds good, is there a general rule about removing information especially old and or outdated content? Not just blanking it but replacing it with current info. Not talking about groups, I know that is a whole different animal. -- LABIA on the INTERNET ^{Dunell Hills Corpseman} #24 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 07:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

No real rules when it comes to templates and stuff like this RevivePointUpdate, other than to present things from a neutral point of view. Oh, and don't change the words that someone else signed. If you want to edit what they said (e.g. status updates for suburbs; this template), replace their signature with your own. But broadly speaking, feel free to update any of those outdated templates with new information, and even if you end up running afoul of some Wikilaw technicality, so long as you're making edits in good faith and it's clear that you're doing so, you should be fine. We tend not to throw the book at people who make seemingly honest mistakes unless we have good reason to believe that they already know better. —Aichon— 15:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)