User talk:The grumpy axeman

Correcting Shacknews Claims

Good points on Rheinhold's argument about Shacknews' so-called "sweep". I did move your post to December 10th and slightly changed the language so it's now referring to the claims "below" it. I did it because, if your "underpost" started a comment battle, some mod, probably Gage or Xoid, will come along and at best move the whole thing to discussion. At worse, start "enforcing" their views on how news should be conducted or lock the page down as they've been threatening (outside their warrant unless people are actually complaining, which a "newswar" would cause). As you probably know, a good number of Shearbank regulars prefer a bit of personality with their news, as opposed to just keeping a scoreboard. Anyway, hope it doesn't p.o. you or anything. If it does, you ought to take to take the argument to discussion. However, I see no reason why you're quest for a more accurate account need be taken out of news, it just has to positioned in the proper news format, if that makes sense. If you want to talk further just drop something by my talk page. Thanks, and I hope you understand.--The Envoy 02:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)