UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Revised Historic Group Policy: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(making several suggestions) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would double check that there's no errant low-vote-but-100%-positive historical group nominations [[MOB|other than the one in question]]. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 23:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC) | I would double check that there's no errant low-vote-but-100%-positive historical group nominations [[MOB|other than the one in question]]. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 23:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Couldn't we make it retroactive only through 2024, so we don't have to do an archeological dig? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC) | :Couldn't we make it retroactive only through 2024, so we don't have to do an archeological dig? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Yes. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 00:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
In my opinion, the minimum vote requirement should be abolished entirely. The functionality of the system should not be allowed to decline as we go deeper into the long tail in the years to come. If there's a concern about this making historical status too easy to achieve, we could increase the required supermajority from 2/3 to 3/4. To preserve turnout, I also propose extending the time limit from two weeks to one month. There's no need to rush this kind of vote. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC) | In my opinion, the minimum vote requirement should be abolished entirely. The functionality of the system should not be allowed to decline as we go deeper into the long tail in the years to come. If there's a concern about this making historical status too easy to achieve, we could increase the required supermajority from 2/3 to 3/4. To preserve turnout, I also propose extending the time limit from two weeks to one month. There's no need to rush this kind of vote. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
:I'm okay with this change too. Maybe I have a preference for 3/4 if there's no minimum vote number requirement. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 00:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:28, 3 July 2024
I would double check that there's no errant low-vote-but-100%-positive historical group nominations other than the one in question. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Couldn't we make it retroactive only through 2024, so we don't have to do an archeological dig? --VVV RPMBG 04:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
In my opinion, the minimum vote requirement should be abolished entirely. The functionality of the system should not be allowed to decline as we go deeper into the long tail in the years to come. If there's a concern about this making historical status too easy to achieve, we could increase the required supermajority from 2/3 to 3/4. To preserve turnout, I also propose extending the time limit from two weeks to one month. There's no need to rush this kind of vote. --VVV RPMBG 04:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
