UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This suggestion takes only the [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Autoconfirmed Group Trial|semi-protection]] part of the policy. This policy would make use of the wiki's inbuilt "Autoconfirmed" group for the purpose of semi-protection of pages such as user or group pages. Wikipedia assigns it after 4 days and 10 edits; on this wiki it has been indicated that a time period of 1 week and 25 edits would be more appropriate. Semi-protection would be requested via the current [[A/PT]] page, the same rules apply and any protections made by Sysops without a request must be listed on the page for future posterity.
==What==
This suggestion takes only the [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Autoconfirmed Group Trial|semi-protection]] part of the policy. This policy would make use of the wiki's inbuilt "Autoconfirmed" group for the purpose of semi-protection of pages, preventing users who haven't been autoconfirmed yet from editing the page.  


Semi-protection of a page would not allow users who haven't been autoconfirmed to be able to edit the page. It works the same as Wikipedia and semi-protected pages, except that the autconfirmation time and edit count is slightly higher and there is no move ability.
Users will be autoconfirmed after 1 week and 25 edits by the wiki software. It cannot be removed.


Note: I changed the 2 months and 200 edits for auto confirmation to ''1 week and 25 edits.''
==Purpose==
This policy would allow pages that normally wouldn't be locked to be semi-protected, normally on pages that do not need to edited by new users but are at risk for vandalism. Semi-protection would prevent vandal-only accounts from vandalizing certain pages, but unlike a full protection it won't restrict other users.
 
Some examples of pages that could be semi-protected:
*[[Template:Wiki News]]
*Other [[Templates|High-use, or high-visibility templates]]
*[[User|User pages]], particularly the signature pages.
*[[Group|High-risk group pages]]
 
==Guideline==
Semi-protections will work much the same way as full protections. Users may request a page to be semi protected at [[A/PT]] which will then be reviewed by a SysOp and action taken accordingly. If deemed necessary, SysOps may semi-protect pages that are undergoing repeated vandalism from vandal only accounts (not autoconfirmed), otherwise a full protection may be needed.
 
Typically, unless there is an imminent threat of vandalism, community pages, talk pages or any page normally edited by new users should not be semi-protected.


==Voting Section==
==Voting Section==

Revision as of 19:36, 11 February 2009

What

This suggestion takes only the semi-protection part of the policy. This policy would make use of the wiki's inbuilt "Autoconfirmed" group for the purpose of semi-protection of pages, preventing users who haven't been autoconfirmed yet from editing the page.

Users will be autoconfirmed after 1 week and 25 edits by the wiki software. It cannot be removed.

Purpose

This policy would allow pages that normally wouldn't be locked to be semi-protected, normally on pages that do not need to edited by new users but are at risk for vandalism. Semi-protection would prevent vandal-only accounts from vandalizing certain pages, but unlike a full protection it won't restrict other users.

Some examples of pages that could be semi-protected:

Guideline

Semi-protections will work much the same way as full protections. Users may request a page to be semi protected at A/PT which will then be reviewed by a SysOp and action taken accordingly. If deemed necessary, SysOps may semi-protect pages that are undergoing repeated vandalism from vandal only accounts (not autoconfirmed), otherwise a full protection may be needed.

Typically, unless there is an imminent threat of vandalism, community pages, talk pages or any page normally edited by new users should not be semi-protected.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

Not yet under voting

Against

Not yet under voting