Developing Guides: Difference between revisions
Misanthropy (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Tactically solid. Could do with a pass through for grammar/spelling, but that's not something that should stop it being considered sound advice. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 18:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | Tactically solid. Could do with a pass through for grammar/spelling, but that's not something that should stop it being considered sound advice. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 18:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
It's all in shorthand, we'll all follow it because we know how to do it before we read the guide. It moves too quickly and without explanation for a newbie to follow. Explain why they're doing these things in detail so that even an American could understand it. I find the constant central intrusion of the map diagram to be dis-jarring when trying to read it as well. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:18, 7 March 2010
Developing Guides
This section is for presenting and reviewing guides which have not yet been submitted and are still being worked on.
Nothing on this page will be archived.
Please Read Before Posting
- Users should be aware that page is discussion oriented. Other users are free to express their own point of view and are not required to be neutral.
- If you decide not to take your Guide to review, please remove it from this page to avoid clutter. You may move the discussion to your guide's talk page if you wish to preserve a record of the discussion.
Adding a new Guide
Post all guides in the following format, changing only the text in red to reflect your Guide's name;
==[[Page Under Development]]== --~~~~ ===Comments===
Cycling Guides
- Guides with no new discussion in the past week may be removed.
- Any Guide posted on Guides/Review Should be removed from this page, any comments on this page should be copied onto the Guides talk page.
Please add new guides to the top of the list
Ghost Town Reclamation
--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Tactically solid. Could do with a pass through for grammar/spelling, but that's not something that should stop it being considered sound advice. 
18:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
It's all in shorthand, we'll all follow it because we know how to do it before we read the guide. It moves too quickly and without explanation for a newbie to follow. Explain why they're doing these things in detail so that even an American could understand it. I find the constant central intrusion of the map diagram to be dis-jarring when trying to read it as well. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 18:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
