UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Yonnua Koponen vs Jorm: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Why?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::::::::My dif link made me think Jorm put both messages up, sorry. (I didn't pay enough attention) :( --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:51, 6 June 2010 (BST) | ::::::::My dif link made me think Jorm put both messages up, sorry. (I didn't pay enough attention) :( --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:51, 6 June 2010 (BST) | ||
:::::::::Don't worry. I think Kyle may actually be a sanctioned candidate though. I dunno. That seemed to be what people were thinking half a week ago.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 11:58, 6 June 2010 (BST) | :::::::::Don't worry. I think Kyle may actually be a sanctioned candidate though. I dunno. That seemed to be what people were thinking half a week ago.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 11:58, 6 June 2010 (BST) | ||
::::::::::Ahh but of course. Still IMO it doesn't really explain what he's going to do to rep the zombies but he hasn't had time to do that yet. Still haven't been sold off the Blob and Cobra ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:04, 6 June 2010 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 11:04, 6 June 2010
Why?
How about we quit bickering and stick to the format of the last election? ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 00:55, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- +1--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:07, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- That was Yon's original plan, and it didn't suit Jorm, hence this entire case. If I was going to rule that way it'd entirely be a one-sided affair.
01:26, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- Then scrap the entire zombiecratic and humanitive groups, tbh there shouldn't even be a case. There was a format determined by the last election, just because one person thinks they're above that doesn't mean it should be replaced entirely. Either you have the major parties or you don't and it'd be a lesser election without them (things like Murbulskond would have never happened). ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 02:28, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- You can make a one sided ruling if the other side is completely wrong.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:17, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- That was Yon's original plan, and it didn't suit Jorm, hence this entire case. If I was going to rule that way it'd entirely be a one-sided affair.
Why is jorm being such an immature dipshit about this? --
01:30, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- Because immature dipshit seems to pass for badass these days ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 02:28, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- Mmm. Perhaps dipshit wasn't the word. But immature definitely was. IMO the Barhah party should have just replaced the Zombiecratic party. But I prefer all parties to be equally valued. -- 07:19, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- I disagree, replacing it as a major party/adding another non general major party/implementing single candidate returning parties is a dick move to all the minor parties, scarp both entirely or leave it as it was ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 07:41, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- I don't see how it's a dick move to the minor parties, it puts the major parties and the minor parties on the same even keel. 19:00, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- I was referring to replacing zombiecratic with the new barhah party as DDR suggested, adding the barhah party as a third major party or implementing the single candidate returning parties which currently solely benefits you. Sure it may have a benefit in the next election but that's going to be a long way off. Scrap the major/returning parties altogether or leave it as it was last election ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 00:40, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Honestly, I don't know why you and jorm are complaining that Misanthropy is getting something out of this. You do realise people are capable of reading beyond the first candidatem right? And the reason Barhah could have replaced Zombiecratic is because Barhah is a zombie rep party as much as Zombiecratic is, but the latter is quite obviously dead. So there would have been no harm in just replacing it (if the "major party" system was going to stay which it hasnt). -- 01:55, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- How is zombiecratic dead, the page had been up for what... 16 hours when barhah party went up? ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 05:11, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Try days? -- 07:34, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Still irrelevant, you can't just say a party is dead and replace it entirely with another of a different focus. If misanthropy isn't getting anything out of it there should be no problem scrapping both
majorreturning parties and making them all equal ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 10:04, 6 June 2010 (BST)- Sorry, I didn't realise the "focus" of 'barhah' and being 'zombiecratic' were different. It may be because I'm mainly pro-survivor that I blindly see them as the same ultimate goal. /sarcastic. really, as if they aren't the fucking same. And your position about "focus" is rich considering you somehow took over and turned the Zombiecratic party into an advert for Kylestyle. -- 11:51, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Still irrelevant, you can't just say a party is dead and replace it entirely with another of a different focus. If misanthropy isn't getting anything out of it there should be no problem scrapping both
- Try days? -- 07:34, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- More importantly, how is zombiecratic dead considering they made an official statement saying they were still choosing candidates before Jorm even turned up?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:25, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- My dif link made me think Jorm put both messages up, sorry. (I didn't pay enough attention) :( -- 11:51, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Don't worry. I think Kyle may actually be a sanctioned candidate though. I dunno. That seemed to be what people were thinking half a week ago.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:58, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Ahh but of course. Still IMO it doesn't really explain what he's going to do to rep the zombies but he hasn't had time to do that yet. Still haven't been sold off the Blob and Cobra ;D -- 12:04, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Don't worry. I think Kyle may actually be a sanctioned candidate though. I dunno. That seemed to be what people were thinking half a week ago.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 11:58, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- My dif link made me think Jorm put both messages up, sorry. (I didn't pay enough attention) :( -- 11:51, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- How is zombiecratic dead, the page had been up for what... 16 hours when barhah party went up? ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 05:11, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- Honestly, I don't know why you and jorm are complaining that Misanthropy is getting something out of this. You do realise people are capable of reading beyond the first candidatem right? And the reason Barhah could have replaced Zombiecratic is because Barhah is a zombie rep party as much as Zombiecratic is, but the latter is quite obviously dead. So there would have been no harm in just replacing it (if the "major party" system was going to stay which it hasnt). -- 01:55, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- I was referring to replacing zombiecratic with the new barhah party as DDR suggested, adding the barhah party as a third major party or implementing the single candidate returning parties which currently solely benefits you. Sure it may have a benefit in the next election but that's going to be a long way off. Scrap the major/returning parties altogether or leave it as it was last election ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 00:40, 6 June 2010 (BST)
- I don't see how it's a dick move to the minor parties, it puts the major parties and the minor parties on the same even keel.
- I disagree, replacing it as a major party/adding another non general major party/implementing single candidate returning parties is a dick move to all the minor parties, scarp both entirely or leave it as it was ♥ Moonie Talk | Testimonials 07:41, 5 June 2010 (BST)
- Mmm. Perhaps dipshit wasn't the word. But immature definitely was. IMO the Barhah party should have just replaced the Zombiecratic party. But I prefer all parties to be equally valued. -- 07:19, 5 June 2010 (BST)
