Category talk:Stadiums: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Misanthropy (talk | contribs) |
Red Hawk One (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Does this really need to be a category? It seems sufficient as an article. All of the stadiums are mentioned in the article so there's no real benefit or extra information gained by having this as a category. Also, it reads like an article, not a category. Thoughts?--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 03:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | Does this really need to be a category? It seems sufficient as an article. All of the stadiums are mentioned in the article so there's no real benefit or extra information gained by having this as a category. Also, it reads like an article, not a category. Thoughts?--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 03:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:See [[:Category:Malls]] for another example of "wait this isn't an article?" in the location cats. The category itself is more for cataloguing pages rather than being a directory in and of itself. I would also like to point out, for the benefit of the descriptions, that the UK does indeed have ice hockey too. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | :See [[:Category:Malls]] for another example of "wait this isn't an article?" in the location cats. The category itself is more for cataloguing pages rather than being a directory in and of itself. I would also like to point out, for the benefit of the descriptions, that the UK does indeed have ice hockey too. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Bear in mind that '''Template:Info buildingtype''' automatically categorizes the pages it is used o... Odd, [[Template:Info Stadium]] doesn't seem to do so. Regardless, uniformity dictates we have the category, and it ''does'' save an extra page. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 04:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:20, 1 December 2010
Strange
Does this really need to be a category? It seems sufficient as an article. All of the stadiums are mentioned in the article so there's no real benefit or extra information gained by having this as a category. Also, it reads like an article, not a category. Thoughts?--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 03:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- See Category:Malls for another example of "wait this isn't an article?" in the location cats. The category itself is more for cataloguing pages rather than being a directory in and of itself. I would also like to point out, for the benefit of the descriptions, that the UK does indeed have ice hockey too.
03:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Bear in mind that Template:Info buildingtype automatically categorizes the pages it is used o... Odd, Template:Info Stadium doesn't seem to do so. Regardless, uniformity dictates we have the category, and it does save an extra page. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
