UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Promotion Procedure(2): Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==Main header== Essentially a copy of UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Promotion Procedure.<br>Original policy 2 and 3 would have passed under current policy (that got ri...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Main header==
==Main header==
Essentially a copy of [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Promotion Procedure]].<br>Original policy 2 and 3 would have passed under current policy (that got rid of the 20 votes minimum), but didn't, as the 20 votes rule was still enforced. Thus, I feel that the wiki has changed enough to make it sensible to resubmit these policies.<br>Policy 1 isn't included in this overhaul, as it wouldn't have passed under current policy, so that I feel that it would be a cheap tactic to try again to get it through without other significant changes having happened. However, the slight wording change from Policy 1 is included, as it didn't seem to draw as much as flak as the idea to raise the bar for new sys-ops. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 14:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Essentially a copy of [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Promotion Procedure]].<br>Original policy 2 and 3 would have passed under current policy (that got rid of the 20 votes minimum), but didn't, as the 20 votes rule was still enforced. Thus, I feel that the wiki has changed enough to make it sensible to resubmit these policies.<br>Policy 1 isn't included in this overhaul, as it wouldn't have passed under current policy, so that I feel that it would be a cheap tactic to try again to get it through without other significant changes having happened. However, the slight wording change from Policy 1 is included, as it didn't seem to draw as much as flak as the idea to raise the bar for new sys-ops. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 14:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
:Meh. It doesn't really need changing. Show me a sysop who used the "I am really strong in one criteria but not the other" card. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:57, 24 January 2011

Main header

Essentially a copy of UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Promotion Procedure.
Original policy 2 and 3 would have passed under current policy (that got rid of the 20 votes minimum), but didn't, as the 20 votes rule was still enforced. Thus, I feel that the wiki has changed enough to make it sensible to resubmit these policies.
Policy 1 isn't included in this overhaul, as it wouldn't have passed under current policy, so that I feel that it would be a cheap tactic to try again to get it through without other significant changes having happened. However, the slight wording change from Policy 1 is included, as it didn't seem to draw as much as flak as the idea to raise the bar for new sys-ops. -- Spiderzed 14:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Meh. It doesn't really need changing. Show me a sysop who used the "I am really strong in one criteria but not the other" card. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)