UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Unbiased Group Listings: Difference between revisions
(I can comment) |
Rosslessness (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
And I think this is a completely unnecessary policy proposal. There absolutely should not be a wiki policy concerning where a group should or should not be listed on suburb listings. If there is a dispute (such as the dispute that arose today) then it should be worked out between the involved parties or brought to arbitration if a compromise cannot be worked out. {{User:Vapor/sig}} 20:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | And I think this is a completely unnecessary policy proposal. There absolutely should not be a wiki policy concerning where a group should or should not be listed on suburb listings. If there is a dispute (such as the dispute that arose today) then it should be worked out between the involved parties or brought to arbitration if a compromise cannot be worked out. {{User:Vapor/sig}} 20:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
==A lot of talk about NPOV== | |||
You need to start by defining the range of this policy. Would it apply to all groups? If not, how would it be enacted? How would the neutral persons be selected? How would the decision be carried out? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:19, 10 February 2011
Discuss
I'd like to know how to word it better, and if anyone has any suggestions on this before it is submitted for official discussion/review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tyx94 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 10 February 2011.
- Should be moved to UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Unbiased Group Listings if you actually want to bring it up as a policy. If you just want to polish on it before bringing it to the wiki public, it should go to your userspace. Regardless, mainspace is the wrong place for it. -- Spiderzed▋ 20:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
I can't comment
Because I'm waiting for both parties to agree to an arbitrator. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
I can comment
And I think this is a completely unnecessary policy proposal. There absolutely should not be a wiki policy concerning where a group should or should not be listed on suburb listings. If there is a dispute (such as the dispute that arose today) then it should be worked out between the involved parties or brought to arbitration if a compromise cannot be worked out. ~
20:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
A lot of talk about NPOV
You need to start by defining the range of this policy. Would it apply to all groups? If not, how would it be enacted? How would the neutral persons be selected? How would the decision be carried out? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
