Talk:Barhah: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Gobbleykins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Robot: Substituting template: Wikipedia) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The BARHAR section is retarded. We don't care which groups accept a word or not. At all. [[User:Joe Anger|Joe Anger]] 17:55, 24 August 2007 (BST) | The BARHAR section is retarded. We don't care which groups accept a word or not. At all. [[User:Joe Anger|Joe Anger]] 17:55, 24 August 2007 (BST) | ||
:I've never even heard of "barhar" outside of this wiki page. I think the whole section should be removed.--[[User:Mister Nathan Marbles|Mister Nathan Marbles]] 22:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC) | :I've never even heard of "barhar" outside of this wiki page. I think the whole section should be removed.--[[User:Mister Nathan Marbles|Mister Nathan Marbles]] 22:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Whatever happened to Barhar? I remember that for a long time it was the cry of a lot of ferals and a few small hordes but its a long time since I heard anyone else use it.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 15:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Theistic Barhah Fundamentalism == | |||
In my observations and my estances amidst my zombie comrades, I have begun to notice the emergence of Barhah, not as a spiritual or brotherhood sense, but as an actual God. I intend to publish a paper on the matter. <small>—The preceding [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Comrade Texidor|Comrade Texidor]] ([[User talk:Comrade Texidor|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Comrade Texidor|contribs]]) 21:53, October 19, 2010.</small> | |||
:See also [[User:Misanthropy/The Barhah|ten or so]] views on the matter, in case it helps. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:55, 19 October 2010 (BST) | |||
:I disagree entirely. However, this does make me think that a thread should be opened on barhah.com to discuss the improvement of the article, removal of groundless drivel <small>(namely that from survivors)</small>, and maybe get it passed on [[GA]]. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:32, 19 October 2010 (BST) | |||
::Lol, normally I'd say "shut up you bitch anyone can have a say if it's well written" but the whole article is really bleeeeeeeeh. Get that shit fixed bro. as a failure in the school of barhah I wouldn't be able to help. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 23:36, 19 October 2010 (BST) | |||
:::Sod threads elsewhere. ''Notify'' over there but there's little to no point developing something off-site (unless it's super sekrit). I'll have a pass over this for anything I can do just as soon as I finish tea. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:40, 19 October 2010 (BST) | |||
Hey, thanks for that link, Misanthropy! Gotta love Yonnua Kopounen's interpretation. [[User:Comrade Texidor|Comrade Texidor]] 00:59, 27 October 2010 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:43, 20 May 2011
History
So who first coined the term, anyway? Where does it come from? These would be good topics for this article.--Jiangyingzi 20:25, 28 July 2007 (BST)
- Put up an etymology section, it's been bugging me for ages where it came from! Arrgh :P--Gobbleykins 16:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
The BARHAR section is retarded. We don't care which groups accept a word or not. At all. Joe Anger 17:55, 24 August 2007 (BST)
- I've never even heard of "barhar" outside of this wiki page. I think the whole section should be removed.--Mister Nathan Marbles 22:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Whatever happened to Barhar? I remember that for a long time it was the cry of a lot of ferals and a few small hordes but its a long time since I heard anyone else use it.--Honestmistake 15:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Theistic Barhah Fundamentalism
In my observations and my estances amidst my zombie comrades, I have begun to notice the emergence of Barhah, not as a spiritual or brotherhood sense, but as an actual God. I intend to publish a paper on the matter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Comrade Texidor (talk • contribs) 21:53, October 19, 2010.
- See also ten or so views on the matter, in case it helps.
21:55, 19 October 2010 (BST) - I disagree entirely. However, this does make me think that a thread should be opened on barhah.com to discuss the improvement of the article, removal of groundless drivel (namely that from survivors), and maybe get it passed on GA. --VVV RPMBG 23:32, 19 October 2010 (BST)
- Lol, normally I'd say "shut up you bitch anyone can have a say if it's well written" but the whole article is really bleeeeeeeeh. Get that shit fixed bro. as a failure in the school of barhah I wouldn't be able to help. -- LEMON #1 23:36, 19 October 2010 (BST)
- Sod threads elsewhere. Notify over there but there's little to no point developing something off-site (unless it's super sekrit). I'll have a pass over this for anything I can do just as soon as I finish tea. 23:40, 19 October 2010 (BST)
- Sod threads elsewhere. Notify over there but there's little to no point developing something off-site (unless it's super sekrit). I'll have a pass over this for anything I can do just as soon as I finish tea.
- Lol, normally I'd say "shut up you bitch anyone can have a say if it's well written" but the whole article is really bleeeeeeeeh. Get that shit fixed bro. as a failure in the school of barhah I wouldn't be able to help. -- LEMON #1 23:36, 19 October 2010 (BST)
Hey, thanks for that link, Misanthropy! Gotta love Yonnua Kopounen's interpretation. Comrade Texidor 00:59, 27 October 2010 (BST)
