Category talk:Recruitment: Difference between revisions
MisterGame (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:::::As Aichon. Most death-cultists seek out life on purpose so much they're pretty much the same as "ordinary" PKers anyway.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | :::::As Aichon. Most death-cultists seek out life on purpose so much they're pretty much the same as "ordinary" PKers anyway.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:'''Vouch''' - :D --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 17:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | :'''Vouch''' - :D --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 17:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Going off what I was saying earlier, I'd just make it "Survivor", "Zombie", and "Other", and define the first two as groups who fight for and exist almost always as that side (e.g. traditional survivor and zombie groups, while death cultists are out, since they play as humans sometimes but fight for zombies). The third category would be for everyone else, such as PKers, death cultists, life cultists, dual nature, etc. I think that would fall in line with most people's expectations better, and it should deal with almost all of the fringe cases. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
=Category:Recruitment Rules Voting= | =Category:Recruitment Rules Voting= |
Revision as of 18:41, 8 January 2010
Help Desk
- Need help figuring out how to use / follow / get the most out of the new advert guidelines? Post here!
- Previous discussions? Look in the archives(2 3)!
- Try reading this guide for a quicker result!
Magic Words for timestamps
I just now noticed that a few groups were using the {{CURRENTMONTH}}, {{CURRENTDAY}}, and {{CURRENTTIME}} magic words in their templates so that they could circumvent having to update their timestamp. The rules for the page say no included templates, but the magic words are not technically templates, yet they still are handled like an inclusion and require processing by the server. Plus, they clearly circumvent the spirit of the guidelines by allowing the ads to be posted ad infinitum, even if the groups go bust. I was thinking it might be prudent to contact the groups and ask that they update by hand instead. Thoughts? —Aichon— 09:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wipe their ads, and tell them to re-add them without the magic words. As you tell them, they're templates in all but name, and are a pretty blatant circumvention of the guidelines. Linkthewindow Talk 10:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Awwwwww. :( 22:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Pull 'em. --Papa Johnny 22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
You people suck. Moreover, this is in breach of no rules and I maintain that we have every right to use this method.
Format for Posting Adverts:
It is the group’s responsibility to update the timestamp to prevent the advert being deleted. Updating the timestamp may and should be done at any time while the group is still recruiting.
We're still recruiting and will be recruiting until such time as we or (more likely) the game are no longer around. I instituted this update method because I didn't want to have to make some bullshit form-stamping edit every so often for absolutely no useful reason. The timestamp is being updated, why should you care what method we use? Answer: You shouldn't.
Format for Advert Content:
No templates are allowed in your advert for technical reasons.
The "technical reasons" alluded to would be the template inclusion limit. The variables used are not expensive and are subject to no such limit, thus this does not apply. Nice try though. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 08:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
While perhaps not in the spirit of the rules, I see no harm in the use of the magic words as long as the group is still active. A messege on the group's talk page (similar to the current Recruitment page warnings) every 3 months I think wouldn't be too much hassle. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 08:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree Revenant, you lack a timestamp entirely. Displaying the current time and date in no way replicates the function of a timestamp, which is used to record specific dates. Further, if we're going to play "abuse the wording" I would argue you don't meet this part either: It is the group’s responsibility to update the timestamp... since it's automated and requires no edits by the group. -- RoosterDragon 17:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Splitting up Recruitment
At the moment, Recruitment is so big it's unwieldy. It takes close to twenty seconds to load on my 1.5mbs broadband, and it would be unfair to assume that everyone has this internet. Also, with groups spread across different letters of the alphabet, it's difficult to find a group for a particular type of character.
I'm proposing that we turn this page into a disambig for three new pages:
Rules, etc, will remain on the main Category:Recruitment page. A reminder will be on all of it's subpages to check the rules.
This should make load times a bit more reasonable and make it easier for new players to find a group. Also, thanks to SA for providing the motivation to write this post :D. Linkthewindow Talk 10:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I like this idea. But I'd propose that death cult-type groups go in both Zombie Groups and PKer Groups. 13:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Letting them double up is effectively extra/unfair advertising. We need to set up the disambig pages so that it's clear which one each group should fall under. —Aichon— 22:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- It used to be like this! I didn't like it when it was changed to the current mess and definitely support changing it back :D --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Better. Do eet. Do eet naow. -- Rahrah doesn't remember the age of blinking text. 17:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- As Aichon. Most death-cultists seek out life on purpose so much they're pretty much the same as "ordinary" PKers anyway.--Thadeous Oakley 18:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Better. Do eet. Do eet naow. -- Rahrah doesn't remember the age of blinking text. 17:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- It used to be like this! I didn't like it when it was changed to the current mess and definitely support changing it back :D --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Letting them double up is effectively extra/unfair advertising. We need to set up the disambig pages so that it's clear which one each group should fall under. —Aichon— 22:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Vouch - :D --Haliman - Talk 17:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Going off what I was saying earlier, I'd just make it "Survivor", "Zombie", and "Other", and define the first two as groups who fight for and exist almost always as that side (e.g. traditional survivor and zombie groups, while death cultists are out, since they play as humans sometimes but fight for zombies). The third category would be for everyone else, such as PKers, death cultists, life cultists, dual nature, etc. I think that would fall in line with most people's expectations better, and it should deal with almost all of the fringe cases. —Aichon— 18:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)