Suggestion talk:20081125 Depants: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Gus Thomas (talk | contribs) (New page: ===Potential for abuse=== Really, a comment for Saralan as well, but rather then dupe my comment I'll just stick it here. I understand the concern, but really this is a game and meant to b...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Potential for abuse=== | ===Potential for abuse=== | ||
Really, a comment for Saralan as well, but rather then dupe my comment I'll just stick it here. I understand the concern, but really this is a game and meant to be fun. There are many elements of this game that could be offensive, and with the global span of the player base it is not hard to imagine people that may abuse this as suggeted. However, personally I think anyone that thinks Kevan would pass this suggestion without some defence equilivant to the "Ignore List" for text rapist is maybe reading too far into this suggestion in my opinion. --{{User:Gus_Thomas/Sig}} 05:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | Really, a comment for Saralan as well, but rather then dupe my comment I'll just stick it here. I understand the concern, but really this is a game and meant to be fun. There are many elements of this game that could be offensive, and with the global span of the player base it is not hard to imagine people that may abuse this as suggeted. However, personally I think anyone that thinks Kevan would pass this suggestion without some defence equilivant to the "Ignore List" for text rapist is maybe reading too far into this suggestion in my opinion. --{{User:Gus_Thomas/Sig}} 05:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I understand where you are coming from, Gus, but I have voted on the suggestion as it is: there is nothing in the explanation about a defence against people who would abuse the action. If there were, I would most likely remove my vote. --{{User:Saralan/sig}} 05:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:27, 25 November 2008
Potential for abuse
Really, a comment for Saralan as well, but rather then dupe my comment I'll just stick it here. I understand the concern, but really this is a game and meant to be fun. There are many elements of this game that could be offensive, and with the global span of the player base it is not hard to imagine people that may abuse this as suggeted. However, personally I think anyone that thinks Kevan would pass this suggestion without some defence equilivant to the "Ignore List" for text rapist is maybe reading too far into this suggestion in my opinion. --Gus ThomasSpartaZHU 05:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
