Suggestion:20090109 Quarterly Cities: Difference between revisions
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
#'''keep''' The suggestion is something I would like to see as the first few months of a new city are by far the best time to play. I can think of a lot of other ways to do this but the suggestion of "new city every 3 months" which is the core of this idea is what they would all boil down to. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 10:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | #'''keep''' The suggestion is something I would like to see as the first few months of a new city are by far the best time to play. I can think of a lot of other ways to do this but the suggestion of "new city every 3 months" which is the core of this idea is what they would all boil down to. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 10:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Keep''' I'd like to do this as I missed out on both Monroeville and Borehamwood. [[User:Nemesis645|Nemesis645]] 15:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | #'''Keep''' I'd like to do this as I missed out on both Monroeville and Borehamwood. [[User:Nemesis645|Nemesis645]] 15:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Keep''' This is a great idea, not only will this provide more experienced players with a challenge but also it will allow for a great number of players to join the game. [[User:Me101|Me101]] 11:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
'''Kill Votes''' | '''Kill Votes''' | ||
#'''Kill''' Seems like entirely too much extra work to be demanding of Kevan. Also, it seems like it would only work out for people who abandoned characters after quarantine or had the money to pay every 3 months to have the sever cap removed. [[User:Faranya|Faranya]] 20:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | #'''Kill''' Seems like entirely too much extra work to be demanding of Kevan. Also, it seems like it would only work out for people who abandoned characters after quarantine or had the money to pay every 3 months to have the sever cap removed. [[User:Faranya|Faranya]] 20:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:55, 10 January 2009
20090109 Quarterly Cities
ChiefyMan 05:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion type
New Cities, Revived Cities
Suggestion scope
Everyone
Suggestion description
I would like to suggest that, every three months, a new city - or going back and forth between a new city and reviving an old "temporary" city - be created. During those three months, it will be opened. After three months, when a new city is created or an old one, such as Monroeville, is revived, that city will go into quarantine.
This will allow the game to add fresh new cities for survivors to fight for and the walking dead to kill for without having to join a large, well-set city - Malton. Possibly once a year, once there are enough new cities to do this with and depending on the "following" the city has, it could be reopened for another three months to allow new players to enter and reignite a city possibly overrun by one group or the other.
This will help to keep interest by current and past players while giving new players options to join a "specialty" city available to join for a limited time or a city that is already very well established.
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
- keep As the author, I obviously like the suggestion :-p - # justification ChiefyMan 05:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- keep The suggestion is something I would like to see as the first few months of a new city are by far the best time to play. I can think of a lot of other ways to do this but the suggestion of "new city every 3 months" which is the core of this idea is what they would all boil down to. --Honestmistake 10:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I'd like to do this as I missed out on both Monroeville and Borehamwood. Nemesis645 15:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This is a great idea, not only will this provide more experienced players with a challenge but also it will allow for a great number of players to join the game. Me101 11:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Kill Votes
- Kill Seems like entirely too much extra work to be demanding of Kevan. Also, it seems like it would only work out for people who abandoned characters after quarantine or had the money to pay every 3 months to have the sever cap removed. Faranya 20:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Kill - The suggestion is somewhat incomplete, and the number of created cities could put a great deal of stress on the servers. --ZsL 23:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam and Dupe - Same exact sort of thing has been suggested before plus if Kevan wants to give us new cities, he will give us new cities.--SirArgo Talk 06:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam/Dupe - As above. Liberty 06:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - This isn't strictly a dupe. Most of those ideas, including my version of these, were on Talk:Suggestions only, plus there'll be enough distinctions for me to make it stay. It is however Spam due to it being incomplete, it's a vague "What if?" -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - As above. ■■ 17:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - As above.--Michaleson CAPD 18:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Voting Rules | ||
Advice to Suggesters
Advice to Voters
| ||
Rules for Discussions
Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20090109 Quarterly Cities). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted. | ||
Valid Votes
| ||
Invalid Votes
| ||
Comments
| ||
All Caps
Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters. | ||
VOTING EXAMPLES
Keep Votes
Kill Votes
Spam/Dupe Votes
|