User talk:Dr Cornblum: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Dr Cornblum (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Dr Cornblum|Dr Cornblum]] <sup>[[X:00]]</sup> 23:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Well, I made the [[0:00]] page, since that is my sifht. Well not so much as did it, just stole your code for 6:00--{{User:Che13/Sig}} 22:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | Well, I made the [[0:00]] page, since that is my sifht. Well not so much as did it, just stole your code for 6:00--{{User:Che13/Sig}} 22:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:59, 1 January 2010
Dr Cornblum X:00 23:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Well, I made the 0:00 page, since that is my sifht. Well not so much as did it, just stole your code for 6:00--♠ Che ♠-T GC X 22:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Oooh, if you break into Whippey again, can you target me? --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 06:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- You still get one XP for thet though, :P. --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 06:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I haven't destroyed a genny with my zombie yet, but 'cade smashing gives you 1 XP. --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 06:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- So I can see how well X:00 works. --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 07:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Popping in for a quick bite to eat? --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 07:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- So I can see how well X:00 works. --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 07:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I haven't destroyed a genny with my zombie yet, but 'cade smashing gives you 1 XP. --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 06:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
KiZombie
Hey, I saw you referenced KiZombie on the X:00 page. I never realized that was what I was using- I'm just a plain speaking zombie who using whatever "aangrazh" words I can. True KiZombie tends to go right over most people's heads, I think, especially when you get into specialized lexicon like numerals and cardinal directions. Its probably easier for most people to sign up for a web forum and metagame that way, than for them to learn a new language. Just trying to tell people the logic behind the X:00 concept often confuses them enough... --S.Wiers X:00 03:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)