UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Misanthropy vs Axe Hack: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Farce) |
(→Farce) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::::::I'm a Computer Science ''graduate student''. I feed off of logic and starve where it is absent. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:19, 5 July 2010 (BST) | :::::::I'm a Computer Science ''graduate student''. I feed off of logic and starve where it is absent. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:19, 5 July 2010 (BST) | ||
::::::::This statement is false.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:27, 5 July 2010 (BST) | ::::::::This statement is false.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:27, 5 July 2010 (BST) | ||
:::::::::That's merely a paradox being relayed by a liar. Nothing illogical about that unless I assume you're not lying. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:07, 5 July 2010 (BST) | |||
:I'm cool with you having that, but it means that every time you vote, you'll be vandalbanned for sock-puppetry.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 00:13, 4 July 2010 (BST) | :I'm cool with you having that, but it means that every time you vote, you'll be vandalbanned for sock-puppetry.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 00:13, 4 July 2010 (BST) | ||
::Nonsense. Sockpuppeteers' votes are only worth 1 (or 0), since we ignore any sockpuppet votes. I'm saying that I'd still only get a single vote, but it'd be worth 3. That's not sockpuppeting. That's just being better than everyone else. ;) {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:34, 4 July 2010 (BST) | ::Nonsense. Sockpuppeteers' votes are only worth 1 (or 0), since we ignore any sockpuppet votes. I'm saying that I'd still only get a single vote, but it'd be worth 3. That's not sockpuppeting. That's just being better than everyone else. ;) {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:34, 4 July 2010 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 01:07, 5 July 2010
Farce
This is a farce and a mockery of the arbitration system. It has to be said. Furthermore, I move that the two of them be banned for life but that in any future voting I carry the weight of both Axe Hack and Misanthropy in my votes, effectively making my vote worth 3 points (plus any additional respect or authority either of them may possess that can't otherwise be quantified). —Aichon— 23:32, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- Also, you guys do realize that you need a judge, right? You can't have a jury without a judge. —Aichon— 23:38, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- Judges exist in democracy. I believe it's been established that the UD wiki is not a democracy. But yes, you're absolutly right. They want arbitration though, and I'm inclined to give it to them. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 23:41, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- YOU ARE A FARCE AND A MOCKERY ACORN. :(
00:02, 4 July 2010 (BST) - Judges aren't tied to democracy any more than police officers are. There are judges in monarchies, tribal settings, or practically every other form of government. —Aichon— 00:48, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- Sysops are the judges when a case of breaking this arbies ruling is sent to A/VB. -- 04:03, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- I won't disagree, but that's like pointing out that there's a judge when you go to appeals. What about the judge at the initial trial? The judge runs the courtroom, after all, not the jury foreman. —Aichon— 05:48, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- Duuude, look at this arbies case. Why are you trying to get any sort of logic out of it?! -- 07:16, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- I'm a Computer Science graduate student. I feed off of logic and starve where it is absent. —Aichon— 01:19, 5 July 2010 (BST)
- This statement is false. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 01:27, 5 July 2010 (BST)
- I'm a Computer Science graduate student. I feed off of logic and starve where it is absent. —Aichon— 01:19, 5 July 2010 (BST)
- Duuude, look at this arbies case. Why are you trying to get any sort of logic out of it?! -- 07:16, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- I won't disagree, but that's like pointing out that there's a judge when you go to appeals. What about the judge at the initial trial? The judge runs the courtroom, after all, not the jury foreman. —Aichon— 05:48, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- Sysops are the judges when a case of breaking this arbies ruling is sent to A/VB. -- 04:03, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- YOU ARE A FARCE AND A MOCKERY ACORN. :(
- Judges exist in democracy. I believe it's been established that the UD wiki is not a democracy. But yes, you're absolutly right. They want arbitration though, and I'm inclined to give it to them. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 23:41, 3 July 2010 (BST)
- I'm cool with you having that, but it means that every time you vote, you'll be vandalbanned for sock-puppetry.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 00:13, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- Nonsense. Sockpuppeteers' votes are only worth 1 (or 0), since we ignore any sockpuppet votes. I'm saying that I'd still only get a single vote, but it'd be worth 3. That's not sockpuppeting. That's just being better than everyone else. ;) —Aichon— 00:34, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- It would be multiple votes controlled by the same account, which is sockpuppetry. I move that all jurors impose a ruling saying Aichon cannot use the letter 'Q', under penalty of torture!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 00:49, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- I concur,... in fact, I also say that he should be slave for a day to each of the twelve jurors. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 01:25, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- Aye! Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 03:01, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- I concur,... in fact, I also say that he should be slave for a day to each of the twelve jurors. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 01:25, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- It would be multiple votes controlled by the same account, which is sockpuppetry. I move that all jurors impose a ruling saying Aichon cannot use the letter 'Q', under penalty of torture!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 00:49, 4 July 2010 (BST)
- Nonsense. Sockpuppeteers' votes are only worth 1 (or 0), since we ignore any sockpuppet votes. I'm saying that I'd still only get a single vote, but it'd be worth 3. That's not sockpuppeting. That's just being better than everyone else. ;) —Aichon— 00:34, 4 July 2010 (BST)
