UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2011 03: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) |
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
orpaned & crit7 --{{User:Lady Clitoria/Sig}} 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC) | orpaned & crit7 --{{User:Lady Clitoria/Sig}} 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
==[[Annus_Horribilis/RH]]== | ===[[Annus_Horribilis/RH]]=== | ||
orphaned & crit7 --{{User:Lady Clitoria/Sig}} 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC) | orphaned & crit7 --{{User:Lady Clitoria/Sig}} 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 3 March 2011
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
Annus_Horribilis/CH
orpaned & crit7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Annus_Horribilis/RH
orphaned & crit7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Test Page adsad
Obvious C1 is obvious. (And no, C1 isn't scheduled, so I have to wait for a 2nd op deleting it and/or a regular user demanding SD to deal with it if I want to be on the safe side.) -- Spiderzed▋ 11:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Served Speedy Deletions
Update
wat -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- KEEP - Jesus God, man, it's just been created. Also, check the Box's talk, the user wants to create an update system for RPs like the DangerReport system. If anything, this could go on A/MR, but it's so not a speedy deletion it hurts.
16:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- yerrrr dangerreports go on the article of the location much like the user's been using it, so good call! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't understand you here. Instead of moving this to the template namespace and letting the user develop it, you want it deleted outright without any cited criterion? Why? 18:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Erm. I don't understand you here. User wants to make a danger-report like template. User creates said template and includes it on a page called Update. User doesn't touch Update again and continues to include the danger-report like template on actual location pages, which is the way it should be used. I assume Update was made for some sort of sandbox for the template he made. and the crit is crit 1, assumed it was so obvious by looking at the content I didn't care to specify. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- In case it wasn't clear, Mis, the template exists at Template:RPSM, and Update is just an inclusion of that template.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- See that's clear now. I had assumed Update actually was the template. As such, yes, this is crit 1. 23:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- See that's clear now. I had assumed Update actually was the template. As such, yes, this is crit 1.
- In case it wasn't clear, Mis, the template exists at Template:RPSM, and Update is just an inclusion of that template.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Erm. I don't understand you here. User wants to make a danger-report like template. User creates said template and includes it on a page called Update. User doesn't touch Update again and continues to include the danger-report like template on actual location pages, which is the way it should be used. I assume Update was made for some sort of sandbox for the template he made. and the crit is crit 1, assumed it was so obvious by looking at the content I didn't care to specify. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't understand you here. Instead of moving this to the template namespace and letting the user develop it, you want it deleted outright without any cited criterion? Why?
- yerrrr dangerreports go on the article of the location much like the user's been using it, so good call! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
