Talk:The Dead's Resurgence

now we have something to do this summer \o/ -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking

bitch 05:04 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Movement

There has got to be a better place for this. Anywhere really, ideas for the most suitable home until this can be expanded as an actual existing event and not a building timeline with one point? --Karek^maps?! 11:26, 3 April 2011 (BST)

Throw it into my namespace if its otherwise wasted.--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:07, 3 April 2011 (BST)

I don't know if it is to be honest, haven't been on the game in a while but, there has got to be either more or a more relevant place where they are actually, say, active? --Karek^maps?! 12:30, 3 April 2011 (BST)

Perhaps we should leave it be until some more information is acquired... It's only been two days and it isn't hurting anyone. Although from what Nubis/DCC used to say, The Dead are notoriously anti-wiki so we may see ourselves through this whole dead resurgence thing without any 'official' news from the leaders/members. Surely there isn't any harm in waiting though. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 14:16, 3 April 2011 (BST)

I agree with Karek. I've stumbled over this page twice now walking back to the map room. What does Krazymouse think this is? Some sort of wiki where users are allowed to make pages? --Kirsty cotton 15:02, 3 April 2011 (BST)

Not this shit again. Maybe there's already a comprehensive page for the Dead. Something like this perhaps? We'll decide on our own whether or not we want anything more than that and we don't need you fucking retards deciding for us. That's what brought us here last time and I'm sure a few people remember just how well that went for everyone involved. Do you want that again? --Laughing Man 15:06, 3 April 2011 (BST)

Your pictures were always excellent. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:58, 3 April 2011 (BST)

Why wouldn't we? -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 01:21, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Soooo...any suggestions where to move it? It appears that User:Anothergenericzombiee views this as a group page. Surely it is not. He reverted some edits as if the group had ownership, though. Maybe it's better suited on a subpage of The Dead 2.0 or even The Dead. If we keep it here, it is surely to be continuously "vandalised". ~ _{20:27, 4 April 2011}

Move it to Krazymouse's userspace. He has claimed ownership of it by creating it, and as a userspace page, any vandalism can be easily verdicted if necessary. -- Spiderzed▋ 20:34, 4 April 2011 (BST)

If it's not a user group page, then what is it? Something chronicling current events? Surely that should have an NPOV and not some wacky DHPD propaganda and speculation. If it's Krazymouse's then he can do whatever. --Anothergenericzombie 23:46, 4 April 2011 (BST)

It appears to be neither of those things at this moment. I agree with Spider, this should be moved to userspace until it can be worked out what the article really is about. Krazymouses' userspace makes most sense. ~ _{23:59, 4 April 2011}

It should be a neutral page chronicling current events, as genericzombie is saying. If it goes another day or so without any useful updates or input from any user, then put it in mouse's userspace, or better yet, just delete it. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 01:46, 5 April 2011 (BST)

I meant more along the lines of: Can we develop a developing article space for things like this or at least add some content to it? Probably should have been clearer on that, no real reason to move it to his namespace just needs to be made clear that this is a possible future article and wasn't sure if we'd made a new space for developing those. --Karek^maps?! 09:02, 5 April 2011 (BST)

The DHPD should not be editing this page, and certainly shouldn't be making edits which aren't NPOV. As far as we are aware DHPD Officer 666 is nothing to do with us (in all fairness The Dead say he's nothing to do with them either). If there is any funny business from DHPD members on this page (or others) report to me and we'll deal with it. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 09:41, 5 April 2011 (BST)

they have 1337 members now. hope to god that's deliberate-- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 07:25, 5 April 2011 (BST)

Nope. Up to 1343 now. ~ _{08:02, 5 April 2011}

;_; -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 08:38, 5 April 2011 (BST)