Talk:Oedipus Wrecks

A Contradiction

"Zergs need not apply." I'm sure that pretty much means this group's actual membership number is zero. Plenty of evidence to go around that you took advantage of zergs. Plenty of evidence indeed. Go ahead and remove this. This'll be easily dug up from the history tab anyways, with it being the first edit and all. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 08:36, 31 March 2012 (BST)

The Accurate Depiction

Now why would we bother to delete this when it's so obviously sour grapes? You got beat...you cry zerg...and you think this reflects on us? No, Axe, we will leave your clumsy, transparent excuses entirely unmolested as a monument to your colossal dipshititude. Regrettably, we can't say the same about your mom.

--Natasha Fatale 23:40, 31 March 2012 (BST)

Fail. Here you think I'm part of CAPD, so it's obvious you're misled. I sit in this conflict as a completely neutral third party, and judging from the evidence at hand, it's pretty obvious you took advantage of the Spandrell/Spandrella/Spandrite zergs. Plus, you're on the borderline of alt ahuse 'cause let's face it. Your so-called crusade began as hate for Julie and Talent hitting Skynet. Now, you claim they're abusing alts first, but, once again, I've gone through the evidence at hand. I can tell you that your little conflict begins with Duck J attacking KempyClassic for something DJ Talent did. So really, who began this whole drama first? Duck J, of course, for failing to keep the dealings of alts seperate. Once again, Bad Attitude Natasha Anne Ciscokitty Fatale Tardew Barbie, I speak as a neutral third party with no involvement in this conflict who has reviewed the evidence as such. Again, feel free to delete this. It's retrievable from that History tab. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 00:17, 1 April 2012 (BST)

Group Subpages

OW/posters moved to Oedipus Wrecks/posters. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 21:22, 24 May 2012 (BST)

Is there some reason the posters can't be linked as we had them? We'd prefer them to be placed as they were; I'll correct this soon if there is no reasonable objection.--Natasha Fatale 23:55, 7 June 2012 (BST)