User talk:Sexylegsread
| Home | Talk | Beatbox Kids | Amusing Locations In Malton | Signature | Navigation | MichaelRead |
All posts that were here, that now aren't here, can be found in the Archives. 2007 or 2008 or 2009
NEW POSTS
Put 'em at the bottom, but above Flav' please.
Warning
Please do not upload racist images on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. -- boxy talk • teh rulz 04:33 5 September 2009 (BST)
- It sure may--CyberRead240 04:34, 5 September 2009 (BST)
- Just like to point out though, I don't know what is wrong with making fun of my own heritage, when 50% of my family are Aboriginal.--CyberRead240 04:35, 5 September 2009 (BST)
- Because cyberbob doesn't like you. Oh and making fun of black people is very bad hush hush but i can slander hangnut for failing with his english and being a filthy mexicunt all i like.--xoxo 04:37, 5 September 2009 (BST)
- Fucking stupid shit. I should be able to make fun of my own culture without getting in trouble for it. I'll keep an eye on this though. Come irc--CyberRead240 04:41, 5 September 2009 (BST)
- Because cyberbob doesn't like you. Oh and making fun of black people is very bad hush hush but i can slander hangnut for failing with his english and being a filthy mexicunt all i like.--xoxo 04:37, 5 September 2009 (BST)
- Just like to point out though, I don't know what is wrong with making fun of my own heritage, when 50% of my family are Aboriginal.--CyberRead240 04:35, 5 September 2009 (BST)
Arbitration
Has started. Please proceed here --
Thadeous Oakley 23:34, 11 September 2009 (BST)
PD
Wut? No, I only put it up to see if it was a good idea, widely accepted by the community. It wasn't. In fact, it was widely rejected. I didn't want to start a shitstorm by telling everyone that they were wrong and I was right. For now, I'll ditch the policy idea, and I'll be more prone to starting up a project in my userspace. There's no reason for me to cause an absolute farce with it.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- You put it up so it looked like you were doing more sysoppy things, when all you are doing is pretending to do sysoppy things so that people will think you are experienced in the areas of policy discussion etc etc, when in actuality you just put a shit policy up so you could link to it later on. Even when you go for sop again in a few months im going to against you until you do some actual work.--CyberRead240 07:17, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- For the last time, although completely unbelievable, that was actually not something I was thinking of doing for sysop. I really wouldn't need to, seeing how I've got a metric ton of edits, I helped ross cleaning up orphans, I deal with the suburb news archival, I frequent A/MR, A/M and A/A, with visits to A/VB when applicable. I know all the admin pages, I'm highly active, and I have stuff going for me, or at least that's how I see it. The only thing I need now is community support, so do you really think I'd try to get that by putting up a policy I knew had potential flaws in it?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:20, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- You knew that thats the next part of the wiki you needed to cover to get people on your side, everyone knows the best way to get sysop is to have a policy discussion productively hopping along with your name credited as the author, so you did exactly that. Except you put up a fail policy and got murdered for it and now you are mercilessly defending it as a nothing policy that never had any real intentions because it makes you look stupid now.--CyberRead240 07:23, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- Read the original text of the policy and then ask yourself whether I was just finding the community opinion out.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:24, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- I don't need to read it again, you were hoping people would love it and then you would have put in your sysop bid OH LOOK AT MY POLICY I MAED and then people would think you actually knew what you were doing. The fact that you put the last bit, so people could tell you it was shit, was only covering your own behind because it was a half arsed policy that you couldn't be bothered making any better, and you wanted to finish it before you put yourself up for Promotion. You are extremely transparent.--CyberRead240 07:26, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- Read the original text of the policy and then ask yourself whether I was just finding the community opinion out.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:24, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- You knew that thats the next part of the wiki you needed to cover to get people on your side, everyone knows the best way to get sysop is to have a policy discussion productively hopping along with your name credited as the author, so you did exactly that. Except you put up a fail policy and got murdered for it and now you are mercilessly defending it as a nothing policy that never had any real intentions because it makes you look stupid now.--CyberRead240 07:23, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- For the last time, although completely unbelievable, that was actually not something I was thinking of doing for sysop. I really wouldn't need to, seeing how I've got a metric ton of edits, I helped ross cleaning up orphans, I deal with the suburb news archival, I frequent A/MR, A/M and A/A, with visits to A/VB when applicable. I know all the admin pages, I'm highly active, and I have stuff going for me, or at least that's how I see it. The only thing I need now is community support, so do you really think I'd try to get that by putting up a policy I knew had potential flaws in it?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:20, 14 October 2009 (BST)
