General Messages

Please leave any general messages to me here, or anything related to my user page or contributions to the wiki.

Devonshire

I will be attempting again in 7 days time time depending on time zones currently 1am bst --User:Sunny946

Whitlock Wizard <- Plaguing Devonshire, KoS please.

We have Bane Croooow

Yes. If you ever want to see him again... I mean, other than in-game... you will come and register on the Dulston Alliance forum. We enticed him there through constant nagging, but now that we have him he will never escape. So come to the DA forums already, we're hoping to get 3 RCDC members... --Mobius 13:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Dulston_Alliance/index.php - Just a FYI. --Tec7890 ^T ^RCDC ^NW 00:58, 30 June 2010 (BST)

NW scans

I know some of the times may be wrong in the summary. I know >.< haste=mistakes.

More Badges!?!

Yes. Your wildest dream has come true. More ribbon badges are now available at NecroWatch. There are now 3 new ribbons for you to earn: Combat Recon, Morrish Sentinel, and Raines Hills Tour of Duty. Please note that only scans reported after January 29th, 2008 count towards Combat Recon (so as to be fair to newcomers). Of course right now 2 ribbons could be earned in one scan, so be sure to visit the Battle of Pitneybank before it's all over. Which shouldn't be anytime soon, mind you. Also look forward to title trophies as the next update, for those NecroTechnicians who consider themselves "the best of the best". ;) --Mobius187 01:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

IYHO

Do you think that Rhodenbank is a "Yellow" danger status suburb? Your scans seem to indicate minimal zombie activity. Have you seen or heard about any break-ins? If not, and you feel confident about it, I would suggest upgrading the security level of Rhodenbank to "Green". --Mobius187 17:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Downgrading. ;) At the time no, and now more so- Zombies are rampaging, eating brains by the dozen. --Tec7890 ^T ^RCDC ^NW 03:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Rhodenbank ended being "orange" again. All things considered, I don't think so... but that's not proof. If possible would you update the suburb's scans if/when you get a chance? --Mobius 13:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll do that. Just getting a few scans right now... --Tec7890 ^T ^RCDC ^NW 20:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Rather safe- would think moderate. --Tec7890 ^T ^RCDC ^NW 20:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't forget to add those 2 scans to your NecroWatch scan tally. I would, but as you have done this in the past I don't want both of us to step on each others feet. That and you would know better when you post new scans. :) --Mobius 13:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Total Scans

And now for the reason I dropped by. As you are localized to a small area you obviously post scans from the same buildings. As such, I think it would be best if you recorded any new scans to your total on the Members wikipage, as I'll overlook them, and that would be unfair to you. I noticed that you've done so once already. So whenever you post new scans, just update the total for yourself. Oh, and keep up the good work. --Mobius187 14:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay then. I will be limited to the Devonshire building for some time (until someone uploads a scan there), as reporting form all the ones around Rhodenbank is making me dizzy. --Tec7890 ^T ^RCDC ^NW 16:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Necrowatch

What's the sense to post your scan over mine that was taken just 6 hours ago?! i'm taking about Image:DevonshireBuildingNecronet.png --~~~~ [talk ] 18:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually nevermind. whatever. i've overlapped your scans too --~~~~ [talk ] 18:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

New Messages go to the top. (NecroWatch links may be moving to the main page) See above: contribuitions to the wiki. Anyway, Does it really matter? That I don't read the file history and upload scans that you proclaim, 'useless'? And why should I care about you overlapping? (and 4 overlaps because of just one on my part? Oo)--Tec7890 14:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

With 100 suburbs you would think this would happen a lot less. I think that moving forward we all just need to always check NecroWatch first and see whether or when the last scan was reported from a location. If nothing has been reported in say 2-3 hours, I say go for it. I think I regret it only when people post scans for me to upload, only I find that someone else has reported a newer scan since theirs... now that's a disappointment. But I get over it. ;) --Mobius187 14:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Suburb Status: Rhodenbank

Hey Tec7890, as you're a native of Rhodenbank and I don't play UD anymore maybe you're in a better position to answer this. Why is Rhodenbank's suburb status "Red"? I ask because I was just handed several NecroNet reports today and the largest concentration of zombies recorded were 33, of which only 5 were grouped. Sure, Rhodenbank is in trouble, but if that's the only trouble it's not "Red" serious. Then again, I have blind spots, namely that I don't play UD. If possible, could you confirm the zombie numbers in the suburb (more or less) and downgrade the status of the suburb's danger level if it meets lower level requirements? Also, keep up the good work on NecroWatch. Thanks. --Mobius187 23:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Mobius (for the complement) I think it's Revenant and Militant Order of Barhah. I will check what exactly the criteria for a dangerous suburb is after dinner. [Edit: Just read a External Military Radio Broadcast. "... reporting from Rhodenbank, I've got maybe seventy active ... a few big groups, but they're spread out ... several buildings with power ... serious collateral damage ... the Starr Building has lights on ..." --Tec7890 16:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Update. It is hard to determine the safety of Rhodenbank, but in the south area with all the NTs, It is reasonably safe (and I would consider those blocks 'moderate'. --Tec7890 18:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Try and see whether you can confirm zombie numbers via NecroNet scans from Rhodenbank's NTs. I think that you only really need two scans, as most of the other NT buildings are grouped together on the east side. Also, you may want to consider checking iWitness for any recent Public reports posted by people in Rhodenbank. Also, one of the best ways, short of NecroNet scans to confirm zombies numbers, is to run recon through the area and pop-out take take a peek every now and then. You're a member of RCDC, right? You may want to coordinate this recon with them. --Mobius187 23:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I would prefer to do my own recon, but unfortunately it's EHB, and I'm a few XPs away from Free Running. I might be able to do this in a few days. --Tec7890 09:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Scans been taken. Uploding to NecroWatch now. --Tec7890 18:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

BIC / NIC

The status template for NecroTech buildings is messed up... You're exactly right: Ruined buildings can be listed as Ransacked... And it is unclear to me what constitutes In Zombie Hands... actually, it's not... But the meanings are different for single tile buildings and multi-tile buildings... meh. The "system" should be revised... --WanYao 21:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Good point, the system needs a revison and division for Malls, Forts and Cathedrals (or whatever it was) and NecroTech Buildings, TRPs, and other Misc hiding spots. --Tec7890 03:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm here on unrelated matters, but NTs do have their own division, the NIC, unless you're referring to something else. --Mobius187 23:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The only thing different is 'Rot Revive' being added. I meant as in for status, as ransacking a tile (of a group) is irrelevant to Single Tile Buildings. --Tec7890 16:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)