UDWiki talk:Privacy policy

Since it is official policy, this page could do with being in Category:Policy Documents. (I know it wasn't voted on, but that doesn't change it being policy.)--Toejam 17:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

---

Considering adding section re: personal data? -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 10:01, 6 May 2011 (BST)

---

yikes! sysops should have to take a personality test...you can hardly trust any1 w/ a plethora of IPs →Son of Sin← 05:55, 13 October 2011 (BST)

To be fair 90% of them wouldn't know what to do with an IP to cause problems if they tried and the other 10% are real tight asses about leaking of personal information. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 07:21, 13 October 2011 (BST)

Interesting opinion. It's true, at times I think checkuser should be only assigned to those who understand the consequences fully but at the same time it really hasn't been a massive issue for a while now. Only a couple times does anyone in the team slip up. annoying 08:43, 13 October 2011 (BST)

Yeah, and then the two worst were insta-demotions where people gave other people access to their accounts. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 13:12, 13 October 2011 (BST)

I've been meaning to write up a new Checkuser policy for a while now. It should not be handed out willy-nilly as it is at present; I think the amount of abuse it has gotten clearly demonstrates that. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 13:34, 13 October 2011 (BST)

Honestly can only think of about four incidents. J3d, Nubis, and two accidental postings(one, again by J3d), it's done significantly more good as far as A/VB is concerned but, then again not everyone takes the time to use it in cases of fly by night vandalism. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 13:42, 13 October 2011 (BST)

And me.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:46, 13 October 2011 (BST)

I don't know why you'd fly that flag when I was giving you a pass by not mentioning your name. :P --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 13:48, 13 October 2011 (BST)