User talk:Amazing
Archive
Disclaimer
This user is currently facing a permanent ban from the Urban Dead Wiki. Please refrain from using this talk page to contact this user.
Amazing can be contacted at (contact information to be added later).
Discussion
What the fuck? Since when do perma'd users get this sort of treatment? You really need a cold shower, Hangnut. --Cyberbob 10:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- had one this morning. No, wait, it was a warm one. Anyway, since amazing is banned from the wiki and is unable to edit his user page, he granted me permission to edit it so new users can have more info about this user who is often mentioned in policy discussions and other drama-centric discussions. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 11:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, and it looks as though you're being really objective about the whole thing. --Cyberbob 11:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Heh. This will be approved by him later on, so if he doesnt like the 'beardo' bit, it will be removed. But i fail to see why not have a bit of humour in here, specially on a trait of his which was publicly known and which granted him a nickname. :) --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 11:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, and it looks as though you're being really objective about the whole thing. --Cyberbob 11:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Since i have your attention, cyberbob, and you were active during the amazing-era... care to assist me finding the original pic ? The one without the 666 mark in his forehead. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 11:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- I would have no idea where it is. --Cyberbob 11:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Why is he getting special updates on his talk page when he is perma-banned? That's pretty fucking pathetic to be perma'd from a wiki for a free browser game and still want or care about what your user page says. Are you going to make a shrine to Grim? Just let Amazing fucking go. If people are curious about him they can read the archives and get the real story. Not just your spin.--– Nubis NWO 13:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ludwig Controversy. nuff said. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 15:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- That's entirely different; it didn't involve editing the guy's actual user/talk pages, requiring the use of sysop abilities. This does. Make a separate page if you must, but don't do it here. --Cyberbob 20:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
...So, is it possible someone can revert all this to the original state, now its obvious Hagnat isn't going to be finishing this? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:44, 1 May 2009 (BST)
- hurf durf. dont jump into conclusions cuz of my inactivy. i will finish this (and some other projects i had) when i have the time --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 19:28, 1 May 2009 (BST)
