Suggestion talk:20080310 Unzergable Lootin'

Discussion (Wasteland Change)

Jesus, if the name is bugging you that much I'll resubmit it as just "Lootin'" tommorrow. The "Unzergable" refers to the other suggestion which allowed zergs to stock up on syringes or faks or whatever and serve as portable vending machines. This prevents that by making the search independant of the items on the corpse. Yes, like everything in the game you could find a way to make it more efficient by using a Zerg but seriously, stop being so damn pedantic--Gene Splicer 23:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

These days, it's discussion moved to talk, eh? And I care, why? One RE per vote still works just fine. And to continue this, look at that non author RE which belongs to me. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to point this out to you, but you're being completely illogical. You're meant to be voting on the merit of the suggestion, not the exactness of the title. Anyway, this suggestion is not meant to "stop zerging". It is meant to be harder to abuse than other looting suggestions. The term "unzergable" is intended to be comparative. Do you seriously think he should call it "Less-Abusable-Than-Other-Looting-Suggestions Looting"? Anyway, as I said, this whole stupid argument is irrelevant as to whether the suggestion is good or not. --Anotherpongo 19:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Could you check this out?

You have: "RE - little unsure why Survivors would murder people in Zombie infested areas since there would be Zombies to loot, with the same results, or why they would murder Survivors in an empty area when there would be lit buildings to search in for better results. The only people who would kill a Survivor for this would be people who were going to kill that Survivor anyway. --Gene Splicer 22:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)" In a separate number in Spam suggestions. This is obviously a mistake, and I'd hate to see a great suggestion like this have a problem with a stupid mistake... Especially with so many spam votes that I feel should be kill anyway. --KF 23:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll bite

How exactly is this "unzergable"? --Akule ^{School's in session.} 15:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Check Gene's RE to Karek's vote. I think he explains it pretty well there. --Hhal 16:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

You'd be surprised what zergers would be willing to do. --Akule ^{School's in session.} 16:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Eh, that's true, but at least this suggestion makes it inefficient to zerg. If they zerg, they're just hurting themselves. --Hhal 16:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

They shouldn't hurt themselves. That's my job! ;) --Akule ^{School's in session.} 16:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)