By posting here you agree to and accept the following rules.
The Rules:
- 1. Post new comments at the top using a level 2 header.
- 2. Post all comments in correct English and grammar. This means real English, not the bastardised forms from the colonies.
- 3. You will not be a moron. Seriously, you're supposed to be a human being, act like it here please.
- 4. You will sign your posts in the conventional manner, this means with your own signature and with a datestamp. Templated signatures may be used without restriction provided they do not negatively impact the operation of this page.
- 5. Using the "+" button is not a good idea. I hate scrolling to the bottom of the page (talk pages get very long) and your reply will be ignored on principle. If my attention is required for something or is a procedural message, kindly place it at the top of the page in accordance with rule 1.
These rules apply without exception to any page in my userspace, that's any page that begins User:Iscariot or User talk:Iscariot. This means you shouldn't go hunting for other pages to just be annoying.
*Shudders*
I will offer to represent TZH. I have a Philosophe Knight and a death cultist and could win this case entirely in TZH's favour in five minutes.
You don't really want to do that, do you? D: --Janus talk 23:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. I'm not saying I like them, I don't, I think they're idiotic zergers without any class or taste. However this isn't Brainstock, Barhah or my own personal site where they can be banned on sight, this is the only official resource this game has and they deserve the same rights as every other group that appears in this wiki. I'm not going to allow them to be done over due to a majority dislike of them and their own naivety about the rules. It's that kind of double standard that's got the wiki into such a fucked up state going way back to the survivor dominance of this place from its inception. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Image
Iscariot, my watch list said that you edited the Nov1609.jpg that I uploaded today. Just checking to see if everything was alright and I did anything wrong.--Zaphord 06:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong, we just like to categorise the images as they are uploaded. It is convenient if users categorise them themselves but it's such a rarity we don't really mind. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 08:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's amazing how people speak for me on my talk page.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- We all know that letting you speak for yourself just gets you into trouble =D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Haha! Right, thanks. I'll be sure to catergorise my future uploads--Zaphord 01:25, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration
It's been 2 weeks since anything substantial has happen on that "case". Maybe it's time to accept that there is a slight yet tiny possibility that you were, well how should I put it, wrong. Time for withdrawal and archival, mmkay? --Thadeous Oakley 18:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- shakes head --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)-
- Nope, still continuing the case and disputing both your rulings. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, you. Yeah, you
Psst. I got a little bored and fixed your image with the new-style (Post 8th-Edition) frame, and templating fixes for the rules text. I do believe that qualifies for an owed pint, you rascal. 05:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Go blame Anime, he did it, the only proper CCG I played seriously was B5, because it was awesome. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:
|