Talk:ANTI-RIDLEYBANK RESISTANCE FRONT

COMMENTS

You want the talk from the old page moved over here? 23:34, 19 June 2010 (BST)

so...

your goal is to destroy the RRF? But not take ridleybank? What?Also... good luck buddy with the plan to invade the center of the map.--Mikalos209 22:48, 9 July 2010 (BST)

If u read ALL of my goals, u would have seen both my plan to destroy my nemesis and take back Ridleybank. gamingforglory 22:54, 9 July 2010 (BST)

Just how to you plan to lead this raid into the center of the city, force out the sitting zombies and hold it when they amass their forces to take back their damned homeland? Better question, why bother? You do realize how overly screwed over Ridleybank is, right? It's surrounded on all sides by attack vectors, its like a corner, nowhere to run when its surrounded. Besides what about the village to the south and barhahville? --Mikalos209 02:13, 10 July 2010 (BST)

ga- du- fu- damnit you HAD to mantion stanbury. Now I get so sit back in fear and watch this tard practice "training skirmishes" or some crap in my favourite suburb while he "prepares his fantastical nonattack" or some crap like that. --

 

 

 

 

03:09, 10 July 2010 (BST)

Actually I mentioned them because If your going to take Ridleybank from thbe RRF you gotta take the De facto subdivisions: Stanbury and barhahville--Mikalos209 04:33, 10 July 2010 (BST)

"De facto?" Greater Ridleybank. And that's old news. I hear they the whole of Malton as "Greatest Ridleybank" or some such. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 06:31, 10 July 2010 (BST)

Yes but as grandiose and foolhardy as this goal is, the idea of taking all of malton is to far. I'm using classic old Greater Ridleybank because that's what I learned.--Mikalos209 13:11, 10 July 2010 (BST)