User talk:Eagle of Fire
Eagle of Fire's Message Pad
New Signature
Test.
•Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]•
01:54, 1 July 2010 (BST)
Hi!
|
Stiff Kittens |
| Stiff Kittens was here and loves your page |
UTC and wiki time
If you want to edit the time your timestamp shows, go to "my preferences" at the top, then "date and time". You should see an option for offset, which you can use to edit your timestamp.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for trying to help me.
- However, I already tried that and it still doesn't work... :(
- I've written -5:00. It that wrong formating so that would be why it doesn't work? -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 22:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Discussion board
Greetings Eagle, I've register to your forum with the username Architect. Since my account is new, I cannot create a new topic. Either I'll wait for the activation or you can create the topic and I'll reply to it. See you. --Kwunlei 03:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Some people reported in the past that they had trouble to receive the confirmation email. Please check your spam folder. Meanwhile, I can ask that your account be activated manually. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 06:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- It should be done. Please check again. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 01:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Historic Groups
I thought that groups in the Historic Groups sections of suburbs had to be in Category:Historical Groups. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:56, 12 May 2011 (BST)
- I don't know and frankly, I don't care. I am not a Wiki nazi (comparison to a well known similar idiom: grammar nazi. Don't take it the wrong way please.).
- I am pretty sure that those groups existed way before that list even appeared on the Wiki... So if those groups are not to come back and their leaders are not going to defend the entries, who will? If you (or other people) are removing historical entries based solely on the fact that they are part of a list or not, then you are obviously doing it wrong. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 00:00, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Category:Historical Groups has been around for a long time. Just take a peek at the various archives. If those groups are no longer active and meet the criteria here, then you can submit them for consideration. Unfortunately, it is my understanding that the only groups that can be in the historic sections for various suburbs are the ones who are on that list. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 00:08, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- I think you missed the point where I don't care about a list. I thus won't bother trying to add them there... I do know however that Yagobrew and McZed are historical groups of Yagoton. That they are not part of whatever list is none of my concern. I'm not an admin or even interested in anything similar.
- I actually had a similar discussion with Aichon a while ago. He never mentioned any list, only suggested that I should add or remove groups which are or not really historical to our suburb. You can see that old discussion here. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 00:37, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- I didn't miss that point. I only mentioned it as a caution, because if someone actively cared about it and you kept reverting it to your own whims, you could find yourself escalated to A/VB. I'll look into the matter to find out what that section is supposed to be for. I'll update you once I know, and we can go from there. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 01:16, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Category:Historical Groups has been around for a long time. Just take a peek at the various archives. If those groups are no longer active and meet the criteria here, then you can submit them for consideration. Unfortunately, it is my understanding that the only groups that can be in the historic sections for various suburbs are the ones who are on that list. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 00:08, 13 May 2011 (BST)
Re anti dual-nature
'Welcome to my official "to kill on sight" list. Not because you are picking on my group leader but rather because you actually seem to believe that playing a survivor while alive make sense while you are part of a zombie group. That's so mind numbing that it really blows my mind.'
Sorry your mind isn't up to handling such a simple concept. When I'm a zombie, I kill survivors. When I'm a survivor, I kill zombies. It's pretty straight-forward, dude -- it's commonly referred to as "role playing". But hey, if this is the way you want to go, I'll happily bring in an alt survivor with an official "to kill on sight" list consisting entirely of you. Dick Johansonson 23:31, 7 September 2011 (BST)
- Said by someone who can't even grasp the concept that new topics on a talk page should be added at the bottom... Well, I wonder why I waste time replying to be frank.
- Here is a better concept for you: you play a zombie in a zombie group, and you expect people not to kill you on sight when you are standing? I guess your brain deteriorated enough while under the zombie form to lose common sense. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 08:08, 8 September 2011 (BST)
