UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Poodle of doom vs DanceDanceRevolution (2)

this is a ploy to run people off the wiki.

I admit it. Checkmate. --^{Hey Sweden!} 18:26, 29 September 2011 (BST)

And don't act like my complaints over these actions, or this accusation is completely original to me. -Poodle of Doom^T*C 19:14, 29 September 2011 (BST)

Dude, never defend your behavior with Iscariot's behavior. He is not a good example of how to behave and probably should have gotten banned from his harassment a dozen times over. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 19:39, 29 September 2011 (BST)

God, I love it when we get to the part of the story where someone says something so stupid I don't know what to say. I was refering to Taco2's opening opening statement, where she comes out and says practically everything I've said. Point being, this level of bias isn't anything new here on the wiki. Neither is harrassment. The part that pisses me off the most is that everones in the act. You all know it, but won't admit it. -Poodle of Doom^T*C 20:41, 29 September 2011 (BST)

Don't worry Poodle. As your arbitrator, I promise you a fair and realistic solution to this whole problem.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:43, 29 September 2011 (BST)

We'll see about that. -Poodle of Doom^T*C 20:45, 29 September 2011 (BST)

But I have admitted it. Look. Up there. At the top. --^{Hey Sweden!} 20:47, 29 September 2011 (BST)

What a joke!

And so comes the play on words, where no one can simply say what they mean, and strive to reach the heart of a problem. Instead, everyone will waste everyone elses time, babbling on about nonsense. Seriously, this is between DDR and myself. Karek has no need to be here... -Poodle of Doom^T*C 20:58, 29 September 2011 (BST)

As neutral arbitrator of this case, chosen by both parties, I feel it is necessary that we have a statement on record from Karek regarding this case.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:01, 29 September 2011 (BST)

Regarding what exactly? About his level of bias? And then what? Are we going to address this next? I'm sorry to say that you weren't "chosen", instead, you were less biased than the rest. At that, you were the only one DDR seemed willing to accept. -Poodle of Doom^T*C 21:04, 29 September 2011 (BST)

We shall most definitely discuss the inappropriate comments that took place between DDR and Misanthropy on Mis' talk page, but for now, I want to deal with the wider issue. As you alleged bias and misbehaviour by DDR, I thought it best to ask somebody who has made similar comments in the past, namely Karek. From here, we shall proceed down any avenues I feel necessary to compile enough evidence to rule upon this case, fairly, and with all the facts on the table. Is this acceptable?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:06, 29 September 2011 (BST)

What you say makes sense, however I never claimed bias in this case on DDR's part. What I do claim is an ineffectual wiki staff who seems very much incapable to strike at the heart of the situation. The only real claim I make against DDR in this case is his antagonistic approach to a situation, and further documented hostile acts, starting with comments that have nothing to do with administering speedy deletions. Furthering my point, there are further acts I wish to address. I hope we get to a point where I can. -Poodle of Doom^T*C 21:11, 29 September 2011 (BST)

So your looking at a procedure beyond your own experiences to safeguard new users? --^{Hey Sweden!} 21:13, 29 September 2011 (BST)

Don't worry Poodle. Although my methodology may seem unorthodox, I fully intend to have a comprehensive case. By the time it's over, I'm certain that you will feel that the entire situation has been satisfyingly dealt with.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:16, 29 September 2011 (BST)

This has always alluded me in the past. We'll see. -Poodle of Doom^T*C 21:19, 29 September 2011 (BST)

You do know DDR isn't a sysop any longer, right? ~ _{22:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)}

Yeah I do... and that's part of my point. If he's not a sysop, what point was there in commenting on the A/SD if not to take a jab at me? -Poodle of Doom^T*C 05:01, 30 September 2011 (BST)

lol poodle, I'm not biased in his favor, It's more that arbitration was made to deal with edit disputes not personal vendettas. And particularly not ones that are you reding something into a comment that just isn.'t there. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 23:27, 29 September 2011 (BST)

We really should just do away with arbies. There are other methods of conflict resolution we could be using that and we could avoid shit cases like this altogether. ~ _{23:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)}

I've tried but, maybe it'd be easier now without Grim blocking it. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 02:50, 30 September 2011 (BST)

OBJECTION!

Karek said:

DDR is a meany and made hugnat cry, burn the witch?

	OBJECTION!
	This user has an objection.

DDR is not a meany! He's a fun loving guy! I bring up the Malton Manhunt as evidence! Also, he did not make Hagnat cry! Hagnat was crying that day because the room was filled with onions! --Phoenix Wright 01:20, 30 September 2011 (BST)

dafuq is dis shiet?

see header ^^ --hagnat 02:04, 30 September 2011 (BST)