User talk:Peralta

TR Talk Page

READ THIS FIRST AND THEN THE TEXT BELOW New posts at the BOTTOM! Use a ==Second Level Heading== and remember to sign your posts. --- Feel free to post anything related to myself, my ingame actions or my wiki edits, but please, keep it polite and complete. Archive User Talk Page Talk: Project Search Rates Archive: July-October 2012 Archive: Danger Center Archive: October 2012-2013 Clean slate I moved all of the content on this page to an archive (see the index above). Feel free to post any comments, questions or banter below. PB&J 20:02, 23 May 2013 (BST) Updating Danger Reports I use 4 months as a cut off for "unknown", not 6 months nor 1 month. 6 months is way too old for a report. 4 months is also too long, but 30 days would, as you say, leave almost no reports at all. --SearchDerelict 21:56, 28 May 2013 (BST) Regarding danger reports Hi thank you for your encouraging template. It definitely made me feel better than feeling silly updating something that people might not use. I've to request though that you don't put the statuses of buildings in Roftwood, Tapton and Pitneybank area that are older than 1 month old to "unknown" yet as there are buildings that I never updated because their statuses are still applicable and the lag on wiki makes it hard and seemingly pointless for me to update them when they're still relevant. I might go back to work on them when I've more time. --Crystal Roselle 09:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC) At this time, I generally only update statuses that are from 2012 or older (several buildings in Lockettside haven't even been updated once since their implementation in 2009!). If a status is still applicable, best update the date, since people don't trust a "safe" report that's several months old anyway ;) PB&J 10:34, 29 May 2013 (BST) Ah I'm well aware of those statuses that are years old, seems to be a condition suffered by non-TRP buildings in suburbs at the edge of the map. Unfortunately, lately the wiki lags horribly for me to the point of frustrating, Aichon was mentioning something about the lag is related to updating the Danger Center map. I'll update them when I'm less busy next month, currently real life is interfering my status report work although BB4 will probably change all the building statuses once it starts next month. --Crystal Roselle 09:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Yeah, the Danger Center was one of our cooler ideas, too bad the page refreshes all 5.000 template calls very time you update a Danger Report (which makes updating 10-20 of them at a time laggy). PB&J 10:58, 29 May 2013 (BST) It would be nice if you could "disconnect" the template calling, and only have the map call the danger reports manually. Then it would be an update-every-once-in-a-while thing. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:20, 30 May 2013 (BST) That would be nice, but I have no clue on how to go about that ;) PB&J 08:07, 31 May 2013 (BST) On Humpfries Walk The amusing part of Humpfries walk is that it spells out Hump fries Walk. It is a location where people hump fries, I guess. I am not the only one to find that funny, so I posted it. Perry Kid 13:46, 31 May 2013 (BST) Lerwill Heights The majority of the suburb was ruined by less than a dozen zombies. I hadn't seen a single survivor there in a few weeks until I rediscovered the LHDF had moved south to take back the suburb from behind the general movement lines of Ze Purists. I decided to hold off on a few days of updating so the very small group could gain a little ground, myself helping out of course. Thank you for your suggestions however, I will be sure to implement them in the comming days. Blacjak 20:09, 2 June 2013 (BST)