Suggestion:20130622 Ruined Buildings Not Visible From Inside Other Buildings

20130622 Ruined Buildings Not Visible From Inside Other Buildings

 Swiers 18:08, 22 June 2013 (BST)

Suggestion type
map display change

Suggestion scope
ruined buildings

Suggestion description
Currently ruined buildings show as being dark on the map, which immediately alerts survivors holed up in neighboring EHB's to come over and administer some headshots. It conveys information about local zombie activity much more effectively than a radio, sparypaint, or talking does, and makes it easy to sweep an area for zombie threats using free-running, without ever going outside, making entry points a non-issue.

My suggestion is that when you are inside a building, you would not be able to see the ruined / intact status of other buildings. You would either need to be outside (on the streets) in the same or an adjacent block, or inside the building (including the same large building, so its possible to detect if one part of a mall is ruined from inside another part of the mall) to see if a building is ruined.

And yes, this would have the effect that free-running would carry the risk that you could un-knowingly free-run into a ruined building. If the tiny amount of damage this might cause as a risk you can't take, you could go outside to the street before moving. To reflect this fact, when inside, neighboring buildings would be given a new styling that was different from both ruined and intact buildings, to visually indicate that the status is unknown.

Also worth noting is that it could still be seen if a neighboring building is powered, which is a good indicator that it is likely intact; this could provide a new purpose to powering buildings that otherwise don't benefit much from having a generator.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. author vote. Been a long time since I made a suggestion... and probably nearly as long since any changes were implemented, but I think this would be a good one, especially given the current low population of the city.  Swiers 18:11, 22 June 2013 (BST)
2. I read the suggestion, and in my head I said, "Yeah, Okay." So here's a keep vote. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:16, 22 June 2013 (BST)

   I think I like the unpredictability. Perhaps ruined buildings would only be "invisible" for some number of hours after ruin, rather than for as long as they are ruined. (I'll add that knowing or not knowing a building is ruined depends on what ruining a building means, and how this relates to freerunning into a building or looking at the building from the outside. Surely after many APs worth of decay it would be noticeable, but how soon?) --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:01, 26 June 2013 (BST)

3. Harder is better.. grow a pair --User:Sexualharrison05:16, 27 June 2013

Kill Votes

1. This would likely ruin free running as a person could easily end up at street level unexpectedly and without enough AP to get to an entry point. Might be salvageable if a skill were added under Free Running that warns of attempts to run into ruins. Aside: Claim that it provides incentive to power buildings that shouldn't be powered neglects fact that ruined buildings can have generators. Supereviloverlord ^{Talk Contrib NWO} 08:28, 26 June 2013 (BST)

   Very few ruined buildings have barricades. You can free run out of a ruined building. Hence, you would NEVER "end up at street level unexpectedly and without enough AP to get to an entry point", because a ruined building IS an entry point. Bro, do you even play?  Swiers 03:29, 27 June 2013 (BST)

2. I simply think that it would be fairer, if ruins didn't show up from inside adjacent buildings (at least for a few hours 6 or 12 would probably be sufficent), but if a survivor tries to freerun into a ruined building they would fail to move, and get a message saying "xxxxxx building is ruined, are you sure you want to attempt to jump there?", and get the option to move anyway (risking a fall, which may be necessary from a building surrounded by ruins) -- boxy 12:42, 26 June 2013 (BST)

   That just makes them not visible to people using unpaid accounts. With unlimited scree refreshes, you'd still know where they were, you'd just have to do a lot of annoying clicking (or run some bot to do it for you) to find out. The whole point of this is unpredictabliity / a requirement to leave buildings, not just creating an interface annoyance.  Swiers 03:29, 27 June 2013 (BST)

   Eh? If you're going to constantly check buildings to see if they're ruined, you're soon going to run out of APs, because most of the time they wont be ruined, and you'll automatically jump into the building, using an AP to get there, and another one to get back. I don't see anyone doing that regularly -- boxy 06:23, 27 June 2013 (BST)

   Additional comments moved to talk page.

3. I'm a big fan of increasing survivor risk of getting stranded outside, but I don't think this is the way to do it, since it feels too random and unfair. I'd liken it to zombies having a random chance of getting headshot by an "Army sniper" every time they take a step outdoors. Players should be able to make an informed decision before engaging in dangerous actions, and it makes in-game sense that a free-runner could tell the difference between a ruined and intact building before they jumped to it, so this idea seems to me like it's introducing an invisible danger that will feel arbitrary and frustrating to players. A recent suggestion that added a chance to fail to free run from a ruined building seems like a better way to approach this problem, since then the survivor understands the risk they're taking. —Aichon— 14:38, 26 June 2013 (BST)
4. The only real thing this achieves is upping the annoyance factor for survivors. Terrible idea. --Jerk 17:33, 27 June 2013 (BST)
5. Adds a negligible disadvantage to survivors for the price of a major annoyance. Make the game more fun, not less. -- Spiderzed█ 22:07, 27 June 2013 (BST)
6. kill - I'm going to say no because the suggestion actively decreases fun. While barricades are horrible random movement downside isn't really a good fix for that. I'd rather just see the removal of free running and the capping of barricades at VSB which would serve the purpose of this suggestion more effectively and force more interaction. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 05:02, 29 June 2013 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20130622 Ruined Buildings Not Visible From Inside Other Buildings). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)