Suggestion:20080820 Instance Characters For Different Scenario Cities

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20080820 Instance Characters For Different Scenario Cities

Jon Pyre 15:53, 20 August 2008 (BST)

Suggestion type
Alternate game modes

Suggestion scope
Everyone

Suggestion description
Monroeville was a lot of fun and I'd like to try playing different cities, with individual maps and/or different game rules. I suggest though allowing people to play under their main Malton character's name in each city.

This suggestion presumes a lot since I don't know if you ever plan on adding new cities, but I'm simply presenting this as a method you could use if you hypothetically ever chose to.

What I suggest is adding a link on the left hand side of the game screen, added to "settings", "contacts", and all those other links. This link would say "Cities."

Clicking the link would bring up a list of all cities, showing your character's level in each, perhaps looking like this:

Malton Level 34 Civilian
Monroeville Level 2 Doctor
Amityville Level 11 Zombie
Oceanside -------------------
Research Facility Level 15 Scientist
Mountain Caves Level 9 Zombie

Clicking the name of a city would log you in to your character there. If you click on a city you've never played before, like Oceanside in the above example, it would give you a character creation screen before dropping you in the city. You'd start at level one in each city as the class of your choice. You'd have separate AP, HP, XP, skills, and inventories from the versions of your character in each city. There would be no connection between any of them other than the name and the fact you're playing all of them, so if one dies in City A the one in City B is entirely unaffected. Similarly phone messages sent in one city could only be received in that same city and characters would idle out in each city individually.

In addition to switching between cities while logged in it would make sense to allow people to directly log into the city of their choice. The main sign-in on the UD home page should always be for Malton as the flagship city, but their could be a small "Other cities" link that would let you navigate to individual sign-up pages for each city.

LOGISTICAL ADVANTAGES

  • One important thing that would stay the same between all your characters is your contact list. People added as contacts in one city would remain your contacts in another city. This is the main purpose of this suggestion, to allow people to keep the same group of friends, enemies, and acquaintances in each city.
  • Another advantage of this is that if someone makes a donation for a character they receive the benefit of no IP restriction in any city. Otherwise they'd need to donate once for each new character in each city.
  • No need to remember the names of lots of characters.

GAMEPLAY ADVANTAGES

Variety. This would allow Kevan to experiment with, and for us to experience, all kinds of alternate maps and rules. Big cities, small cities, cities with few buildings, cities with high search rates, cities with low search rates, cities without certain skills (imagine a city without any medical skills for example), cities with special skills or items not found in Malton, cities with higher or lower AP regen, cities with max level 5 so you need to carefully pick what skills to take and specialize, cities where zombies can speak (I guess they'd be mutants there rather than zombies), cities where people lose a level each time they die, the list is endless. Malton is fun but it gets stale. With additional cities you could still play in Malton, but also experience worlds of variety.


Possible Problems

  • Roleplay. Some people might have a problem that their character, who is one person, is in entirely different cities and possibly as entirely different people. One answer is to simply consider these "What If" scenarios. Malton could be canon, these alternate cities are just hypothetical. If that doesn't work a simple solution is to simply make a different character for each city.
  • Not wanting to be recognized. What if you're a PKer in City A, but you want to play as a pro-survivor in City B. People in City B will recognize you from City A and might kill you. Again, the solution is just to make a new character for the different city.
  • Server load. More cities means more clicks right? However the IP restriction still stands. Unless they make a donation they'll be limited to 180 a day. And if they do make a donation then that $5 can go towards Kevan's cost of running the site. In fact, this might give people added incentive to make a donation and benefit Kevan financially.
  • People abandoning Malton. Won't Malton, the main city, become a ghost town? No, it'll remain a click away from any other city. I think Malton will have a higher active population if people stick with Urban Dead, even to play other cities, rather than getting bored and leaving entirely.
  • You personally not wanting to play other cities. Ok, don't. Nobody is required to play anything other than Malton if you don't want to. But why stop everyone else from playing other cities?
  • Kevan might have no desire whatsoever to make other cities. In that case, this suggestion can just remain in peer reviewed as an option. Most of those suggestions will never be used, they just remain on record as possibilities that the players wouldn't mind taking effect. All I'm saying is, I'd like alternate cities and here's an easy way of managing it. At the end of the day if Kevan doesn't want more than Malton it's not going to happen.

How many cities would there be? Up to Kevan. He could periodically add them at whatever pace he prefers. A new one every six months might be nice.


Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. Keep Why not try new versions of Urban Dead? It isn't as if playing seven card stud detracts from other people playing Texas holdem. Urban Dead is a great game, but it gets a bit boring after three years, even with the many improvements. BTW, this suggestion is not to suggest new versions of Urban Dead. Kevan already came up with that himself in Monroeville. I'm just suggesting an interface that could keep alternate cities from getting unwieldy for players should he ever do it again.--Jon Pyre 16:07, 20 August 2008 (BST)


Kill Votes

  1. Kill Way too much stuff for one suggestion. And what if i have more than one character in malton. Which would appear on the sidebar? Although Id like to see finis' sidebar. (No innuendo meant.)--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:20, 20 August 2008 (BST)
    REing Myself. Also the ability to add numbers to names make this seem like an overrly complivated method. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:29, 20 August 2008 (BST)
  2. Kill - Different cities -> different people. Different people -> different names. Simple as that. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 17:23, 20 August 2008 (BST)
  3. Kill. No. Go make your own game--Airborne88Zzz1.JPGT|Z.Quiz|PSS 19:44, 20 August 2008 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Get the fuck over these new city suggestions already. --Papa Moloch 16:00, 20 August 2008 (BST)
  2. Spam - Last I checked, Suggestions was there to help improve a game, not make a bloody new one. --Vandurn 16:27, 20 August 2008 (BST)
  3. Spam - May I suggest you go and create your own game? Then you can do all this stuff and we can all go and not play it - Sage|Carr Cobra 16:35, 20 August 2008 (BST)
  4. Spam - As the above. Go make your own game if you want a new game, which is a rather concise summary of your suggestion. --The Grimch U! E! 17:09, 20 August 2008 (BST)



Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20080820 Instance Characters For Different Scenario Cities). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)